Go to the id21 home page   id21 - communicating development research
 
id21 is one of a
family of knowledge
services from IDS
 
Search the id21 database

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Home page
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    id21 Society & Economy
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Urban Poverty
 
    id21 Education
 
    About id21
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
    Links
 
    Site map
 
     

id21 viewpoints

id21 invites development workers, activists and researchers to contribute their points of view on development issues. Jerry Cooper, Natural Resources Institute, comments on the use of pesticides in developing countries:

Chemical cure - pesticides in developing countries

The first of the United Nation’s Millennium Development Goals aims to halve the number of hungry people in the world by 2015. To have any chance of achieving this, pesticides will be needed. However, potential benefits must outweigh the problems pesticides can cause.

About 75 percent of the 1.2 billion people living on less than US$1 a day live and work in rural areas. In the short and medium-term, most of these people will continue to rely on farming for survival; farming represents their only chance to escape poverty. While poor people can grow many important crops without using pesticides - maize, sweet potatoes, rice and sorghum are examples - there are three significant problems:

* the harvested yield is often extremely low due to pest damage
* there is a risk of occasional catastrophic crop failure
* the produce may be of low quality.

Other crops are difficult to grow at all without pesticides, particularly in tropical climates. Insects tend to thrive here because there are no hard winters to break their life cycles. Resulting crop losses contribute to hunger and malnutrition, which kill more than five million children annually. Pests also cost developing countries millions of dollars in national income.

Anti-pesticide views are widespread. Some are from well-nourished middle class people who buy organic vegetables, but resort to pesticides if flies or wasps bother them. Nevertheless, concerns are rightly raised about the potential environmental and human health risks of pesticides. However, in many developing countries, as elsewhere, the sensible use of carefully selected pesticides may be a wise choice. For example, using insecticide-treated bed nets reduces malaria, and applying herbicides reduces the need for weeding where there are serious labour shortages. This does not necessarily lead to pesticide dependency, but is the successful use of cost-effective technology.

While using pesticides carefully can be an important tactic for providing enough food for the world's poor people, they should not be regarded as the primary way to reduce damage from pests and diseases. Before the introduction of pesticides, farmers relied on a range of traditional methods, such as crop rotation, selecting plant varieties that grew well and resisted disease, removing infected plants and mixing different crops in the same field. Some of these methods have been forgotten or are no longer used; it is often easier to spray pesticides than to manage the farm environment by more natural methods, so pesticides are often applied unnecessarily, when there are cheaper or better ways to reduce damage.

The value of biodiversity to farmers is also being realised. Natural predators and other beneficial insects can kill large numbers of pests, and biologically based pest control measures, such as fungal and viral diseases of insects, fit very well into a safe and integrated pest management (IPM) system. These IPM systems help farmers to grow profitable crops while reducing the need for pesticides.

The DFID Crop Protection Programme has carried out research into 'softer' pest management techniques. Our work within this programme indicates the need for a three step approach to pest management, which is as relevant to developed countries as it is to developing countries.

* habitat management; encouraging predators, cultural controls, hygiene, resistant crop types, seed treatments (if appropriate).
* soft or natural pest management interventions; insect virus, pheromones, plant extracts or soap sprays.
* pesticide sprays used as the last option.

In summary we propose that pesticides should not be seen as all bad. Provided that pesticides are part of a carefully managed strategy they can bring real benefits in developing countries in the same way that they do in developed countries.

Jerry Cooper, Hans Dobson and Kerry Albright

Jerry Cooper
Natural Resources Institute
University of Greenwich at Medway
Central Avenue
Chatham Maritime
Chatham
Kent ME4 4TB
UK

Tel +44 (0)1634 883729
Fax +44 (0)1634 883379
Email j.f.cooper@gre.ac.uk
www.nri.org

April 2005

Sources
The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2004, FAO / Economic and Social Department (ES), Food and Agriculture Organization, 2004

'Agricultural productivity growth and poverty alleviation' Development Policy Review 19 (4), 449-466, by X. Irz, L. Lin, C. Thirtle, and S. Wiggins, 2001

Comment on this viewpoint by emailing id21viewpoints@ids.ac.uk

What's your viewpoint?
id21 is inviting academics, practitioners, activists, decision-makers, policy-shapers from NGOs, research institutes, governments, donor organisations - indeed anyone involved in international development – to contribute a short article to id21 expressing their point of view on policy issues relating to their work. Click here for more information.

Click here to go back to previous id21 viewpoints


Submit your research to id21

Send us your feedback on the latest editions of 'insights'


Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles featured on the id21 web-site may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2005 IDS. All rights reserved.


FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Insights: research digests

Other News

Comment on this viewpoint by emailing id21viewpoints@ids.ac.uk


Read 'id21 insights #57' People and protected areas - new agendas for conservation

Subscribe to id21's email newletters


id21 is not responsible for the content of external internet sites

id21 is enabled by the UK Government Department for International Development (www.dfid.gov.uk) and is one of a family of knowledge services provided by the Institute of Development Studies (www.ids.ac.uk/ids), at the University of Sussex, UK. Charitable Company No: 877338. id21 is a oneworld.net (www.oneworld.net) partner and a mediachannel affiliate (www.mediachannel.org).