|
|
|
id21
viewpoints
Do
institutions block agricultural development in Africa?
An African farmer
travelling to market passes through seven checkpoints in 100km, in a
vehicle he has to rent. He is not certain that the prices for his produce
will make the trip worthwhile. He lacks the political influence to push
governments to ease transport costs, and the market information to bargain
for better prices.
This farmer is fictional,
but his problems are real. Agriculture supports the livelihoods of two
thirds of people living in sub-Saharan Africa, but addressing the obstacles
facing African farmers requires looking beyond markets and into courtrooms,
polling stations, villages and farms.
Institutions are
the rules and constraints that shape economic interactions. They include
formal laws and policies (as well as enforcement mechanisms for these),
informal traditions and customs, and normal social behaviour patterns
(‘social norms’). Institutions are important for economic development
and for creating dynamic agricultural markets. However, institutional
barriers can also prevent economic development and agricultural progress.
These barriers exist where formal norms are missing, or when their enforcement
is weak. Barriers are also created by contradicting institutional frameworks,
and by clashes between formal rules and informal customs and social
norms. For example:
- Many formal policies
fail to stimulate institutional change. For example, market reforms
(such as liberalisation) suffered from an absence of specific rules,
such as established grades and quality standards for agricultural
produce.
- Policymakers,
development economists and aid workers often overlook cultural and
informal norms. These determine the decisions of traditional authorities
and judges and can also influence the actions of government officials.
- Informal and
formal institutions influence each other. For example, if formal land
tenure reform ignores traditional customs, it will fail to have any
impact and may even create legal uncertainty that undermines the rights
of vulnerable people.
- Social norms
determine acceptable or expected behaviour in households, clans or
kin groups and within communities. These institutions are essential
for allowing farmers to manage risks and to obtain credit and information
- important ‘safety nets’ against bad harvests or disease.
Social norms also
create problems. Egalitarian customs that demand the compulsory redistribution
of crops, income, and sometimes wealth are a tax on asset accumulation
and discourage farmer from investing. Social norms that discriminate
against certain people (foreigners, women or poor people), or prohibit
certain transactions (typically land negotiations) limit agricultural
development and hold back progress. However, social norms do respond
to policy reforms and changes in the economic environment. For example,
legislation in Ghana that allocates part of intestate property to surviving
spouses have altered social norms and strengthened the traditionally
weak land rights of Akan women.
Social norms do
not need to be seen as a solution, or vilified as backward. They must
be acknowledged as part of the institutional environment that influences
economic decisions and outcomes, particularly in rural areas of sub-Saharan
Africa. We need to understand the economic significance of existing
cultural norms to anticipate the effects of policy reforms. Successful
institutional reforms for agricultural development require:
- Changes to formal
institutions that complement cultural norms and encouragement and
support for the evolution of traditional customs.
- An accessible,
trustworthy way to enforce agricultural contracts that will enable
farmers and traders to go beyond ‘cash-in-hand’ economies.
- Political institutions
that allow farmers to organise themselves and address local problems
collectively to give them some influence in the policy formulation
process.
Contributor
Juan R. de Laiglesia
Further information
Juan R. de Laiglesia
OECD Development Centre
2, rue André-Pascal
75775 Paris Cedex 16
France
Tel +33 (0) 1 4524 9382
Fax +33 (0) 1 4430 6150
Email Juan.Delaiglesia@oecd.org
June 2006
Comment
on this viewpoint by emailing id21viewpoints@ids.ac.uk
What's
your viewpoint?
id21 is inviting academics, practitioners, activists, decision-makers,
policy-shapers from NGOs, research institutes, governments, donor organisations
- indeed anyone involved in international development – to contribute
a short article to id21 expressing their point of view on policy issues
relating to their work. Click
here for more information.
Click
here to go back to previous id21 viewpoints
Submit
your research to id21
Send us your feedback on the latest editions of 'insights'
| Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily
those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless
stated otherwise articles featured on the id21 web-site may be
copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating
author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.
Copyright
© 2005 IDS. All rights reserved. |
|
|
|
| FREE Information
Delivery services from id21: |
 |
 |
|
id21 is enabled
by the UK Government Department for International Development (www.dfid.gov.uk) and is one of a family of knowledge
services provided by the Institute of Development Studies (www.ids.ac.uk/ids), at the University of Sussex,
UK. Charitable Company No: 877338. id21 is a oneworld.net (www.oneworld.net) partner and a mediachannel
affiliate (www.mediachannel.org). |
|