|
|
|||||||||||||||
Under India’s regulatory framework, urban local bodies (ULBs) are clearly assigned the responsibility for municipal solid waste (MSW) services. While waste is visible around many Indian towns, there are examples of ULBs that have greatly improved their service levels. What factors are responsible for their success? A report from the Water and Sanitation Program, South Asia presents results from a study of waste management in three small cities in the states of West Bengal, Goa and Andhra Pradesh. None of the programmes were driven by external pressures. They arose because key municipal decision-makers recognised the need for reform after learning about alternative strategies of MSW provision. All programmes were financed by locally generated resources. In all cases, programmes were made part of a larger message directed at the general public and politicians – involving health, child welfare, women’s empowerment and/or civic pride. The focus of the programmes was on primary collection and transportation – increased frequency of collection, elimination of fixed community bins and coordinating transportation systems. In all three cases, attempts at segregating rubbish, composting and recycling have also been made. Organised processing of recyclables has reduced scavenging from open dumps, reducing associated health risks for ragpickers and ensuring greater security of earnings. This is a fundamental shift in approach from basic cleaning services to integrated sustainable waste management. Citizen confidence in city administration has grown and, in some cases, has resulted in improved tax collections. The author describes how:
However, the end disposal of waste remains unaddressed, with open dumping remaining the norm. Despite significant improvements in the civic environment, desired health outcomes have not been achieved due to the absence of safe and sanitary disposal systems. Pricing decisions and contractual terms are often arbitrary and are not supported by costing or performance data. There are still many positive lessons that can be taken from the three cities’ experiences:
Source(s): Funded by: World Bank id21 Research Highlight: 8 June 2007
Further Information: Tel:
+91 11 24690488 Water and Sanitation Program - South Asia Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||