Target ten of Millennium Development Goals (MDG) seeks to halve the proportion of people without sustainable and safe access to water. Although attempts have been made to link the MDGs and human rights, promoting a right to water achieves little if institutions, norms and values remain unchanged.
A paper from the University of Bradford in the UK analyses challenges to putting the right to water into practice. A human right to water means giving priority to drinking water supply. It highlights that providing water services is not charity. Governments should be responsible for ensuring that the human right of those who do not have access is not violated. It also emphasises that discrimination and inequality cannot be tolerated, and that responsibility for addressing violations is universal.
But do poor people benefit from a ‘right to water’ discourse? Constitutional provisions for a formal right to water only exist in a few countries. It is important to examine how effective these have been, but statistics are not always accurate. The study shows:
- In South Africa, the right to water has been promoted since 1997 but it has not had much impact on the proportion of people with access. It has, however, had some qualitative impact in terms of a diminishing sense of water insecurity.
- In Ethiopia and the Gambia, a formal right to water has not made any impact on the proportion of population with access.
- In Uganda, the right to water has coincided with a significant increase in people with access.
- In Namibia, Eritrea and Tanzania, access has significantly increased, despite a lack of ‘right to water’ legislation.
- A right to water does not automatically provide people with water. Inequality in access to water persists and poor people mostly bear the consequences. The content and elements of such a right must be rooted in public debate and the creation of relevant institutions.
- It is evident that:
- High levels of voice, accountability, guarantees of participation and right to information matter in making water policies favour poor people.
- To be meaningful, a right to water should provide scope for determining both fair access and fair allocation.
- What is meant by a ‘human right to water’ needs to be clarified, and how this is different from a ‘property right to water’ made clear. ‘Right’ is not merely limited to ‘powers’ but includes issues related to immunity, privileges and responsibilities.
- Rights are of limited use if people cannot take legal action to guarantee them: those who draft right-to-water legislation must identify what a right means in practice.
Source(s):
‘Right to Water and Access to Water: An Assessment’, Journal of
International Development, 19, pp511–526, by P. B. Anand, 2007
id21 Research Highlight: 8 June 2007
Further Information:
PB Anand
Centre for International Development
University of Bradford
Bradford, BD7 1DP
UK
Tel:
+44 (0)1274 233957
Fax:
+44 (0)1274 235280
Contact the contributor: p.b.anand@bradford.ac.uk
Centre for International Development, University of Bradford, UK
Other related links:
'Water rights for water governance: opportunities and challenges of
regulation in developing countries'
'Time to get serious about the right to water'
'Providing clean water and sanitation: the greatest global challenge'
'New directions for water governance' id21 insights, Issue #67, June 2007
>
The Right to Water
'The Right to Water', WHO 2003 (PDF)
'Achieving water security'
