|
|
|||||||||||||||
Cheap water and sanitation technologies that provide a level of service equivalent to conventional systems are becoming available. Technicians working in small towns, however, may be unfamiliar with them or unwilling to change. In some small towns in Latin America relevant technologies with low investment and maintenance costs are being successfully piloted. A paper from the World Bank’s Water and Sanitation Program highlights lessons learned during a symposium on alternative technologies for water and sanitation supply in small towns held in Lima, Peru. It summarises technical data on costs and requirements for their operation and maintenance. One new technology, successfully trialled in the Bolivian capital La Paz, is condominial water distribution. Water and sewerage lines are extended along pavements and inside people’s compounds rather than having to dig up streets. A connection point is created for each group of houses, rather than to each house. Meters are installed at each condominium connecting point. Construction and maintenance costs are reduced through active community participation. Maintenance can be carried out without disturbing large numbers of users. Another technology relevant for small towns is the settled or small-diameter sewerage system. This is commonly used in the United States and Australia and has recently been adopted in Colombia. Domestic waste water is initially settled in a septic tank that intercepts solids before being conveyed into the municipal sewerage system. In order to achieve potential cost savings authorities must take responsibility for ensuring that septic tanks are desludged, as it is unlikely that householders will do this themselves. Multiple-stage filtration consists of combining thick gravel filtration with slow sand filters. This technology has produced good results in Colombia where there are approximately 50 operating plants. It is cost effective, particularly in small systems where the cost of land is low and local labour and materials are available. Ecological sanitation, using latrines that separate excreta from urine, has the advantages of recycling faeces for agricultural use, preserving water and preventing contamination of soil and groundwater. However, initial investment costs are higher than dry or pour-flush latrines. After each use ashes, dried sand or vegetal material must be supplied so it is essential to ensure householders understand the system and its maintenance requirements. In small towns it is important to find systems with:
The author notes that:
Source(s): Funded by: Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, Panamerican Health Organization (PAHO) id21 Research Highlight: 11 April 2006
Further Information: Tel:
+511 6150685 Water and Sanitation Program - Latin America and the Caribbean Region Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||