|
|
|||||||||||||||
The public sector has failed to bring safe water and sanitation to Asia’s quarter billion poor urban residents. Is it time to examine alternatives to state delivery? What needs to be done to strengthen private sector participation in equitable, efficient and sustainable water, sanitation and solid waste services? A book from the Asian Development Bank (ADB), entitled ‘Beyond boundaries: extending services to the urban poor’, examines water, sanitation and solid waste management in 19 cities in 10 Asian countries. External support agencies are urged to offer substantial and more creative support to ensure that the poor benefit from the switch away from public service providers. Rural-to-urban transition is happening faster in Asia than anywhere else in the world. Some cities face populations doubling in only a decade. By 2015 an additional 595 million people will be living in cities, a large number in informal housing areas and shanties. Water and sewerage consumes a lot of capital, so enormous investment will be required. The current level of average annual investment in the urban water sector in Asia – a mere $3 per person for water supply and $1 per person for sanitation – will have to be substantially increased. A number of innovative partnership schemes are described in the book which could be applied elsewhere, including:
ADB argues that it is crucial to involve the public sector as policy-maker and economic regulator, while civil society, NGOs and small enterprises need to lead the way in innovative, flexible approaches to retailing water and sanitation in the slums and lowest income areas. Private sector involvement is critical, not so much to provide private money to make up the funding gap but rather to reform the existing service provider, thus leveraging investment from those who have given up on the ability of the sector to repay loans. Repaying loans requires viable tariffs and accountable regulators. External support agencies will have a vital role to play to ensure that public-private-community partnerships are pro-poor and service coverage is extended. They will need to ensure local NGOs and contractors are not frozen out by big operators and are supported in articulating local demands and mobilising communities to provide financial and labour inputs to network extension. Donors and lenders could also pay bonuses to operators who achieve universal coverage and provide technical and financial training to enable alternative providers to work alongside private operators. There is also a need for:
Source(s): Funded by: Asian Development Bank id21 Research Highlight: 24 November 2003
Further Information: Tel:
+ 632 632 6229
Richard Franceys Tel:
+44 (0) 1525 863105 Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||