Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Urban Development
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Urban Development
  Planning and
local governance
  Housing and
settlements
  Urban communication
  Urban water
and sanitation
  Urban employment
and income
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Improving urban transport systems: towards a pro-poor, user-centred approach

How should we judge whether a transport system is facilitating or hindering the economic development of a city in a developing country? Can a sustainable livelihoods approach help to better plan transport services for low-income communities in urban areas?

A report from Loughborough University’s Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC) examines the transport system in the Pakistani city of Karachi. Looking at the perceptions of commuters, transport operators, regulators and such other transport actors as mechanics and hawkers, it charts a pathway out of the current transport chaos in a megacity with a diverse population of some 10-13 million people. Currently three more case studies are being undertaken in Faisalabad, Pakistan; Colombo, Sri-Lanka and Dar-es-Salam, Tanzania.

Economic activity in Karachi revolves around the port and the industrial activities it makes possible. Both depend on a huge blue-collar workforce drawn from the outlying squatter settlements which are home to half the city’s residents. In the 1960s misguided military-driven planning policies evicted the poor from the city centre but failed to deliver promised industrial employment on the outskirts. As a result, commuting distances are great.

Ad hoc planning, lack of maintenance, population growth and political/ethnic violence have all contributed to the collapse of a once reasonably efficient public transport system. The public sector has almost completely withdrawn from providing transport. Buses operating on set routes and schedules perform erratically. Forced to perch on roofs of unsafe vehicles, at least two commuters die each day.

The individual owner-operators who run what passes for a transport system have many grievances: high fuel prices, adulteration of fuel and oil, high vehicle import duties, crumbling roads, vendors blocking roads, the absence of bus stops and terminals, lack of credit and insurance facilities and the predatory activities of officials who ‘inspect’ vehicles to solicit bribes.

Other findings presented include:

  • The cost, danger and threat of violence when using transport has caused some women to abandon livelihoods.
  • Thousands of public transport vehicles operate without valid route permits.
  • The unplanned irrational distribution of transport routes creates a situation in which passengers often have to travel long distances in the wrong direction.

The report accepts that the dire lack of public funds will not permit Karachi to get a new transport system. The immediate focus must be on improving the current system and maximising its potential to assist the livelihoods of the poor. Transport planners and academics need to shed western theoretical perspectives, to understand the users’ point of view and explore links between their vulnerability and the transport system.

Recommendations of relevance to other cities similarly struggling to cope include:

  • a single city-wide transport authority with legal status
  • rejuvenation of urban railways and designation of bicycle and pedestrian access ways and bus-only routes
  • replacing mini-buses with larger buses through provision of credit to co-operatives of operators
  • forums and workshops to explore scope for developing self-help solutions to encourage entrepreneurs to build and repair facilities and improve standards of vehicle comfort and safety
  • relocation of hawkers and vendors
  • reduction of pollution by conversion of buses to compressed natural gas and phasing out of auto-rickshaws.

Source(s):
‘Urban public transport and sustainable livelihoods for the poor: a case study: Karachi, Pakistan’ by M. Sohail, WEDC Publications, 2000 Full document.

Funded by: DFID (IUDD)

id21 Research Highlight: 13 August 2002

Further Information:
M. Sohail
Institute of Development Engineering,
Water, Engineering and Development Centre
Loughborough University
Leicestershire LE11 3TU
UK

Tel: +44 (0)1509 222890
Fax: +44 (0)1509 211079
Contact the contributor: M.Sohail@lboro.ac.uk

Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC), University of Loughborough, UK

Other related links:
'Fighting motor madness: rethinking urban transport through a poverty lens'

'Gender in motion. Tackling gender differences in transport needs, access and planning in Ghana'

Transport Links raises awareness of the importance of transport for development

Visit the Smart Urban Transport site for ideas, technologies and case studies to help transport strategists

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 17th November 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC), University of Loughborough, UK site.