Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Urban Development
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Urban Development
  Planning and
local governance
  Housing and
settlements
  Urban communication
  Urban water
and sanitation
  Urban employment
and income
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Fighting motor madness: rethinking urban transport through a poverty lens

How should planners respond to increased travel demand in the developing world’s burgeoning cities? Can transport policies contribute to poverty reduction? What is the impact of government expenditure on transport infrastructure? What are the health and education outcomes of improvements / deterioration in transport conditions?

A detailed report from the Overseas Development Institute pulls together current thinking on the nexus between transport issues and poverty reduction. An accompanying Toolkit suggests how to identify the transport needs of the poor and develop transport interventions to help build a macroeconomic environment that facilitates poverty reduction.

Rapid urbanisation means that not only are more people than ever before living and working in cities, but also that more people and more goods are making more trips over longer distances. In emergent megacities, walking and cycling are ceasing to be options.

Urban transport investments have not generally considered travel modes used by the poor. The poor are increasingly dependent on dangerous unofficial, unregulated and unregistered transport services. They spend a higher proportion of income on transport than the better off. For many, public transport is unaffordable or represents a severe financial burden – some estimates put the percentage of household income spent on transport as high as 20-30 per cent.

Policies discriminate against non-motorised transport (NMTs). Frequently the same level of tariff is demanded of imported bicycles as cars. Rickshaws and pedicabs – a major source of employment for the urban poor – are being driven off the streets by official bans.

Traffic congestion is the most visible manifestation of the failure of urban transport planning. Nowhere is this more apparent than in Bangkok where the average car spends 44 days per year stuck in traffic. Building more roads is rarely an ideal solution as it increases traffic flows, diverts scarce resources, destroys communities and adds to street crime.

The report notes that:

  • where transport costs are prohibitive, breadwinners are prioritised leaving other family members unable to access distant educational or health services
  • the death toll on developing countries’ roads is horrendous: road deaths per 1000 vehicles in India are 18 times greater than in Japan; poor children are particularly at risk
  • whereas China’s former land-use policies enforcing close juxtaposition of workplace and residence promoted cycling, liberalisation has led to much longer journeys and increased reliance on motorised vehicles
  • the Brazilian city of Curitiba has demonstrated what can be done: although the city has Brazil’s second highest per capital car ownership rate, per capita petrol use is 30 per cent below comparable cities as over half the population daily use a well organised bus system.

To emulate this success, and to remove the current anti-poor and gender biases in transport provision, the study calls for:

  • public transport which the middle class will use and the poor can afford
  • improved targeting of public transport subsidies
  • reversing policies penalising pedestrians and NMTs
  • more research on how the urban poor, especially women, currently access services and could benefit from improved access
  • greater attention to road safety and enforcement of traffic laws
  • better informed tax and regulatory policies which are not regressive, anti-poor and conducive to corruption.

Source(s):
‘Poverty and transport’ by David Booth, Lucia Hanmer and Elizabeth Lovell, Overseas Development Institute, June 2000

Funded by: World Bank

id21 Research Highlight: 28 June 2002

Further Information:
Overseas Development Institute
111 Westminster Bridge Road
London SE1 7JD
UK

Tel: +44 (0) 20 7922 0300
Fax: +44 (0) 20 7922 0399
Contact the contributor: d.booth@odi.org.uk

Overseas Development Institute, UK

Other related links:
'Sustainable cities: not a contradiction in terms'

'The Changing Structure of Transport under Trade Liberalisation and Globalization and its Impact on African Development' from CDR

The World Bank focuses on Transport

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 17th November 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the Overseas Development Institute, UK site.