Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Global Issues
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Global Issues
  Population change
  Food security
  Climate change
  Gender
  Poverty
  Human rights
  Global economy
  Governance
  Aid
  Conflict
and emergencies
  Tourism
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Virgins and Casanova: is Africa ready for
e-government?

Can information technology promote new public management (NPM) in Africa? Can e-government projects improve public sector effectiveness and bureaucratic efficiency? How should e-readiness for e-government be measured? How can we close the gaps between project design and African public sector reality that have caused most e-government projects to fail?

A report from the University of Manchester’s Institute for Development Policy and Management (IPDM) seeks lessons from past failures. It suggests ways to ensure that projects are relevant to African needs and circumstances and that they are developed in a spirit of partnership.

Amid widespread sentiment that systems of governance in Africa are in crisis, ICTs are being hyped as a component of New Public Management (NPM). Donors, the consultants they employ, IT vendors and elite Western-trained civil servants together create powerful leverage for e-government. Yet initiatives are started without consultation or understanding. Experienced IT companies are often in a position to dictate the direction and content of e-government. The report equates the imbalanced interactions that occur between African public servants and IT vendors as that of a virgin marrying Casanova.

As in the industrialised countries, ICTs in Africa have been used within governments to replace clerical labour with its digital equivalent. Whether these initiatives achieve their financial cost-cutting goals is questionable – even in the north, efficiency gains have been exaggerated. In Africa, where public sector wage costs can be less than a tenth of those in the West and average ICT costs can be two to three times higher, there is a risk that e-government automation means replacing cheap civil servants with costly ICTs.

Though the paper cites many examples of failed initiatives, not all is doom and gloom. Some e-administration schemes have proven sustainable and efficiency-promoting:

  • In Egypt, multi-sectoral conflicts between six different ministries around issues of tariff reform were speedily resolved by the computerisation of customs tariffs for imported goods – thus reducing the burden on low income groups, increasing state revenue and creating a homogeneous and consistent tariff structure.
  • ICTs have helped South Africa’s Independent Electoral Commission to win accolades for running free and fair elections.
  • In Mauritius, a private partnership initiative has provided a single electronic channel for all income and VAT tax payments Mauritian firms need to make to various government departments.

But any successes have come when e-government projects bridge the gap between application design and current African realities. The report therefore urges policy-makers and donors to:

  • adopt best practice in design-reality gap closure and learn from other African states
  • work to close the knowledge gulf between IT professionals and public officials
  • appreciate the need to identify and nurture those staff members in government facilities, community centres, NGOs and commercial cybercafés who are skilled to act as intermediaries between citizens – forever doomed to remain on the wrong side of the digital divide – and the growing digital infrastructure of e-government
  • abandon the arrogant assumption that e-government experience, knowledge and ideas are a one-way traffic from the north to Africa
  • reject the one-size-fits-all approach to African needs: e-government solutions that work in one country cannot simply be transplanted into others on the continent.

Source(s):
‘eGovernment in Africa: promise and practice’, iGovernment Working Paper No 13, Institute for Development Policy and Management, University of Manchester, by Richard Heeks, 2002 Full document.

id21 Research Highlight: 14 August 2003

Further Information:
Richard Heeks
Institute for Development Policy and Management
University of Manchester
Precinct Centre
Manchester M13 9QH
UK

Tel: +44 (0)161 275 2800 / 2804
Fax: +44 (0)161 273 8829
Contact the contributor: richard.heeks@man.ac.uk

Contact the contributor: idpm@man.ac.uk

Institute for Development Policy and Management, The University of Manchester, UK

Other related links:
'e-Governance: time to get practical?'

'e-Governance: can it lead to better government?'

'Net Gains or net dreams?' Insights #25

'Missing the connection? Using ICTs in education' Insights Education #1

'Silicon idols: Problems of harnessing IT in government'

'The right tools for the job? Policymakers get to grips with new technology'

'Are ICTs the road to riches for the poor?'

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 24th November 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the Institute for Development Policy and Management, The University of Manchester, UK site.