What distinguishes the process of developing Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers (PRSPs) from previous approaches to development co-operation and concessional lending? What kinds of indicators are required for PRSP monitoring? What kinds of institutional arrangements and processes can contribute to learning and accountability around PRSPs?
A paper from the Overseas Development Institute (ODI) reports findings from a study commissioned by the Poverty Monitoring Task Team of the Strategic Partnership with Africa. Drawing on evidence from four full and 17 interim PRSPs in sub-Saharan Africa and innovative practice elsewhere, it makes the case that design of monitoring arrangements should start from what a PRSP is meant to be and not from the established routines of the monitoring and evaluation profession.
PRSPs have led to a major increase in final poverty-outcome measurement, with new rounds of household surveys and plans for participatory poverty assessments. There is much less evidence of renewed interest in measuring the intermediate processes and achievements that will be necessary to produce the desired final outcomes. This is unfortunate as rapid feedback on this level of change is what matters most for accountability and learning.
Other key characteristics of PRSP monitoring noted by the report include:
- the poor quality of the administrative reporting systems on which much of the relevant data depend
- lack of attention to the possibility of using alternative methods to compensate for the unreliability of routine information systems
- neglect of input monitoring
- the failure of documents to specify how stakeholders will be incorporated into PRSP monitoring arrangements and how information will improve policy and implementation
- PRSPs typically have a ‘missing middle’ – they do not discuss why the proposed actions are likely to work better than comparable actions have done in the past, and what are the critical things that need to happen.
The approach taken to monitoring and information issues needs to be more innovative to engage a wider range of stakeholders in policy dialogue about poverty reduction. The paper recommends that:
- Service-delivery surveys and problem-oriented studies are useful complements to administrative data and should have a major place in PRSP monitoring arrangements.
- The problem of lack of demand for poverty-related information must be tackled: the spread of FM radio and PRSP-inspired relationships between new advocacy groups and parliaments offer useful interim solutions to make PRSPs newsworthy and relevant.
- Annual reviews of PRSPs should pay attention to variables that move relatively quickly and provide evidence of real achievements: thus donors striving to support PRSPs with general budget funding can make use of national systems, rather than creating parallel mechanisms, in regulating their disbursement of funds.
- Commitments are to be believed only when they are actually reflected in budgetary allocations.
- Successful institutional arrangements for PRSP monitoring are those that are well-supported politically and also permit swift executive action.
Source(s):
‘Good practice in the development of PRSP indicators and monitoring
systems’, Working Paper 172, Overseas Development Institute, by David Booth
and Henry Lucas, 2002 Full document.
Funded by:
DFID (CNTR 01 2329)
id21 Research Highlight: 9 June 2003
Further Information:
David Booth
Poverty and Public Policy Group
Overseas Development Institute
111 Westminster Bridge Road
London SE1 7JD
UK
Tel:
+44 (0)207 922 0381/0386
Fax:
+44 (0)207 922 0399
Contact the contributor: d.booth@odi.org.uk
Overseas Development Institute, UK
Henry Lucas
Institute of Development Studies
University of Sussex
Brighton BN1 9RE
UK
Tel:
+44 (0)1273 678740
Contact the contributor: H.Lucas@ids.ac.uk
Institute of Development Studies (IDS), UK
Other related links:
'IMF/World Bank Poverty Reduction Strategy: effective, participatory and
locally owned?'
'PRSPs investigated: structural adjustment in another guise?'
'Poverty reduction in the Americas: on course to deliver debt relief?'
'Poverty reduction strategies in LDCs: repeating past mistakes?'
Eldis provides a useful resource on PRSPs
More from the PRSP Document Library
See the World Bank site on poverty reduction strategies and PRSPs