Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Global Issues
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Global Issues
  Population change
  Food security
  Climate change
  Gender
  Poverty
  Human rights
  Global economy
  Governance
  Aid
  Conflict
and emergencies
  Tourism
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Meeting energy needs through the Kyoto Protocol

Smaller energy projects are often well suited to developing countries but find it difficult to attract funding. The Kyoto Protocol, which sets targets for industrialised countries to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, has established the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) to help fund such projects.

CDM initiatives allow developed countries to fund projects that reduce GHG emissions in developing countries. These projects produce a reduction in GHG emissions that gain a certified value, which are sold in ‘carbon markets’. Larger GHG emitters can buy ‘carbon credits’ to offset their own emissions. Research from IT Power, UK and India, and the Energy Research Centre in the Netherlands, examines how the CDM process can benefit developing countries.

The majority of CDM investments have so far been in large-scale projects. Small-scale initiatives have been overlooked. A significant reason for this is that small-scale energy projects struggle to meet the considerable costs for entering the CDM process. One approach to reduce costs is to group together several small-scale projects into a larger one. This process is called ‘bundling’.

Bundles allow small-scale producers to participate without the need to become fully aware of all CDM processes. Instead, experts in CDM management from larger organisations act as coordinators. The research provides a comparison of three projects in different energy sector areas - solar energy, biomass production and energy efficiency. This comparison suggests:

  • Energy efficiency projects and biomass production – such as the recycling of wood, dung and crop waste – are viable for the CDM.
  • Solar energy projects are currently less viable due to low carbon credit generation per system. However, these may become more suitable as CDM credit prices rise.
  • Transaction costs are highest for energy efficiency, followed by solar and biomass projects. However the impact of transaction costs on the viability of the CDM projects is highest for solar projects.
  • Bundles can reduce costs significantly by using the same technology and baselines for measurements.
  • Bundles that involve projects developed by a single organisation have simpler contracts, with lower legal and organisational costs.
  • Bundles with a large number of project developers will be more complex, as each requires separate financing and credit agreements. The whole organisational task is also more complex to implement, particularly monitoring the projects.

Bundling projects together can create funds for small-scale energy projects where finance is lacking. To develop and successfully implement small-scale CDM project bundles, the research recommends:

  • Projects should be bundled at the earliest opportunity and with projects at similar stages, with the number of projects in each made as large as possible.
  • Projects should be assessed for eligibility before development begins and limited to those with common baselines and monitoring plans.
  • Marketing plans should be developed to raise awareness of opportunities in trade associations and other national, regional and local forums.
  • Methods to reduce or share risks must be developed through monitoring and verification, phased implementation, risk management and mitigation tools.
  • Effective national and regional authorities must be formed to support small-scale project developers and intermediaries.
  • Knowledge transfer for financial intermediaries and bundling organisations will support good governance.

Source(s):
‘A Guide to Bundling Small-scale CDM Projects’, IT Power, by Jay Mariyappan, Nishant Bhardwaj, Heleen de Coninck and Nico van der Linden, 2005 Full document.

Funded by: European Commission

id21 Research Highlight: 24 March 2006

Further Information:
John Green
IT Power
16-18 Whiteladies Road
Bristol, B88 2LG
UK

Tel: +44 (0)117 980 9441
Fax: +44 (0)125 639 2701
Contact the contributor: john.green@itpower.co.uk

IT Power, UK

Energy Research Centre, Netherlands

Other related links:
'Meeting greenhouse gas targets and supporting development: a win-win situation?'

'Beyond Kyoto: towards a north-south bargain on climate change'

'Pico-hydro links household electricity to the clean development mechanism'

'Adapting to climate change: developing countries and the global response'

'Can Europe’s ex-communist states profit from the trade in greenhouse gas?'

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 30th June 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21


id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development www.dfid.gov.uk
id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies www.ids.ac.uk at the University of Sussex www.sussex.ac.uk
IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of
www.mediachannel.org

 

 

Go to the IT Power, UK site.

 

 

Go to the Energy Research Centre, Netherlands site.