Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Global Issues
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Global Issues
  Population change
  Food security
  Climate change
  Gender
  Poverty
  Human rights
  Global economy
  Governance
  Aid
  Conflict
and emergencies
  Tourism
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Making sense of food security measurements

Reducing hunger and food insecurity is central to the Millennium Development Goals. Monitoring progress towards targets requires simple, quick and reliable methods. However, this has proved difficult for both researchers and practitioners.

Research from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations looks at how food consumption is measured in Albania, Madagascar, Nepal and Indonesia. The researchers consider the suggestion that, because food security is a complex issue, policymakers should use both ‘quantitative-objective’ indicators, such as calorie intake, and ‘qualitative-subjective’ indicators, such as how people in developing countries view their food consumption.

Many national surveys use subjective questions, such as the World Bank’s Living Standards Measurement Surveys. Subjective questions focus on how individuals or households view their own food security situation. These can often reveal information that is difficult to gain using quantitative measurements, such as information about malnourishment, food intake, nutrition, access to food and vulnerability to hunger. Although subjective, qualitative measurements appear simple, evidence from US surveys shows that this approach to measuring food security can provide valuable information.

However, the reliability of subjective information is difficult to assess. Recent results show subjective indicators often do not match quantitative data. For example, approximately 50 percent of people surveyed in Albania and Madagascar considered their food consumption less than adequate. But it is unlikely that the level of food insecurity in Madagascar is the same as in Albania. Madagascar has lower income per person, greater poverty levels and a higher rate of food insecurity, according to quantitative data.

The research shows:

  • Whether households believe they have enough food usually corresponds with other subjective perceptions; for example, households who do not see themselves as poor, or who think that life has improved, also feel they have a sufficient level of food consumption.
  • Similarly, if a person is unhappy with their present situation, it is likely that they will see their food consumption as inadequate.
  • Households may be comparing their food consumption with neighbours; for example, in Madagascar perceptions of food security are influenced by a household’s wealth in relation to the wider community.

Subjective perceptions from poor households are not enough to fully understand food insecurity. While subjective views can indicate if households are vulnerable to food insecurity, they do not provide enough specific information for policymakers to use when targeting food programmes. Research into food security needs to include the views of poor people, but this must be used alongside improved household survey data. Future research should:

  • redesign food security indicators based on local conditions and local ideas of consumption, as done recently in Brazil, Yemen and Bangladesh
  • develop subjective food security measurements that can be used together with improved household survey data, particularly calorie consumption
  • include measurements that are more sensitive to the particular food issue, similar to the US’s household surveys, and that can be used to validate subjective indicators.

Source(s):
‘Measuring Food Security Using Respondents’ Perception of Food Consumption Adequacy’, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, ESA Working Paper No.5-10, by Mauro Migotto, Benjamin Davis, Gero Carletto and Kathleen Beegle, 2005 (PDF) Full document.

Funded by: World Bank; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

id21 Research Highlight: 10 July 2006

Further Information:
Benjamin Davis
Agricultural and Development Economics Division
Food and Agriculture Organization
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
00100, Rome
Italy

Tel: +39 06 57 056 812
Fax: +39 06 57 055 522
Contact the contributor: benjamin.davis@fao.org

United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization

Other related links:
'Alternative futures: modelling scenarios for food security in Africa'

id21 insights #61 'Achieving food security: what next for sub-Saharan Africa?'

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 24th November 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization site.