Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Global Issues
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Global Issues
  Population change
  Food security
  Climate change
  Gender
  Poverty
  Human rights
  Global economy
  Governance
  Aid
  Conflict
and emergencies
  Tourism
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Myths around asylum seeking: a more coherent approach to forced migration?

Most asylum seekers in Europe come from states affected by high levels of violence, oppression and conflict. On arrival, they are often treated with contempt by politicians, the press and the public. Why have policies failed to curb the flow of forced migrants? Should the European Commission focus on strengthening the borders of ‘Fortress Europe’? 

A report from the Institute for Public Policy Research and Oxford University’s Centre for Refugee Studies critiques current EU policies to address the phenomenon of illegal and forced migration. It warns that those in need of protection will seek sanctuary in Europe as long as violence and human rights violations go unchecked.   

In the 1990s, the top 10 countries of origin of asylum seekers were the former Yugoslavia, Romania, Turkey, Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Sri Lanka, Iran, Somalia and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The report identifies common ‘push factors’ in all of these states: ethnic or religious discrimination, human rights abuses, civil war and a large proportion of internally displaced people relative to the total population.

Europe’s fight against illegal migration has diverted attention from addressing its root causes. Changes in procedures for asylum discrimination and criteria, introduction of temporary protection regimes (used to ensure those fleeing the Balkan wars went home) and declaring Central European states as ‘safe third countries’ to which asylum seekers can be returned, have made it more difficult for those genuinely in need of protection to get asylum while encouraging smugglers and traffickers.

The authors stress that:

  • Flows of forced migrants to Europe are comparatively small when considered against global displacement movements – Iran and Pakistan have much greater refugee ‘burdens’.
  • There is evidence that underdevelopment is not a major push factor for forced migration.
  • Even when fleeing violence or persecution and in need of protection, some asylum seekers have a degree of control over where they go and how they travel.
  • Policy-makers may aspire to make clear distinctions between economic and forced migrants but the migration-asylum connection defies simplistic judgement: many migrants have multiple motivations for moving.
  • Once a migratory flow is established it may be driven by social networks and chain migration patterns, even where policies in relation to asylum seekers change.
  • Discrimination against Kurds is a key factor behind the large number of Iranian, Iraqi and Turkish nationals seeking asylum.

The EU needs to analyse why there have been such divergences between policy-making fora. All relevant Directorates-General of the European Commission, EU member states and interior and foreign ministries within each state need to start working in tandem to implement agreed objectives in addressing the root causes of forced migration.

Sustainable reduction of migration flows requires:

  • long-term joined-up policies to address issues of conflict-prevention and development
  • ending arms exports to regimes with poor human-rights records and those engaged in internal oppression or violence against their neighbours
  • concerted action against illicit trading in diamonds, coltan, cobalt and other commodities which fuel conflicts
  • ensuring that the EU’s High Level Working Group operates more transparently, values expertise from all policy areas and develops measurable policies and programmes.

Source(s):
‘States of conflict: causes and patterns of forced migration to the EU and policy responses’, Institute for Public Policy Research, by Stephen Castles, Heaven Crawley and Sean Loughna, 2003

Funded by: European Commission

id21 Research Highlight: 9 September 2003

Further Information:
Heaven Crawley
Institute for Public Policy Research
30-32 Southampton Street
London WC2E 7RA
UK

Tel: +44 (0)20 7470 6150
Fax: +44 (0)20 7470 6111
Contact the contributor: h.crawley@ippr.org

Institute for Public Policy Research, UK

Stephen Castles and Sean Loughna
Refugee Studies Centre
Queen Elizabeth House
21 St Giles
Oxford OX1 3LA
UK

Tel: +44 (0)1865 270722
Fax: +44 (0)1865 270721
Contact the contributor: Stephen.castles@qeh.ox.ac.uk

Contact the contributor: sean.loughna@qeh.ox.ac.uk

Other related links:
'Separating children from their rights? How Europe fails child asylum seekers'

'Could do much better: Britain’s treatment of young refugees under the spotlight'

'Involvement and empowerment. Better HIV prevention and education for Britain's refugees'

'Responding to displacement: Balancing needs and rights' Insights #44

See id21's links on forced migration

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 25th August 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21


id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development www.dfid.gov.uk
id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies www.ids.ac.uk at the University of Sussex www.sussex.ac.uk
IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of
www.mediachannel.org

 

 

Go to the Institute for Public Policy Research, UK site.