|
|
|||||||||||||||
Refugee children, especially adolescents, are acutely at risk from the effects of violence and conflict. Could the international community do more to offer them protection from sexual exploitation and forcible military recruitment? How could the UN High Commission for Refugees (UNHCR) use community services and education as tools of protection? An evaluation by Valid International (‘Meeting the rights and protection needs of refugee children’) reviews UNHCR operations in eight countries to determine the agency’s success in meeting the rights and protection needs of refugee children. Arguing that the main element missing in protection work with refugee children is social protection, it sets out recommendations to complement and sustain the legal and physical approaches more traditional to UNHCR’s protection work. The agency has long prioritised child protection. In 1994, UNHCR established guidelines on its work with refugee children and in 1997 adopted a new strategy following the landmark study by Graca Machel on the impact of armed conflict on children. Despite this commitment, the evaluation found that UNHCR field staff are confused about what child protection means or what UNHCR’s policy prioritisation of refugee children entails. There is a limited understanding of child rights as the framework for child protection, lack of location and culture-specific situation analysis, insufficient recognition of the social aspects of protection and poor integration of protection work with community services. In analysing the confusion, the evaluation found that the roles of general versus specialist staff with regards to work with refugee children are unclear. The agency’s Action for the Rights of the Child (ARC) training initiative has produced high quality resource materials but the sheer volume of ARC materials has intimidated generalist staff and not reached frontline staff, especially the nationals who are most involved with refugee children. Momentum generated by the Machel study and special reporting on follow-up strategies may have given the impression that work with refugee children somehow falls outside the UNHCR’s core mandate and activities. The team also found that:
The report found that child protection works best in field situations where there is active collaboration between community services and protection staff, complemented by pro-active support, mobilisation and the use of community networks. Community services and education functions are central to the protection of refugee children. The evaluation calls on the UNHCR to:
Source(s): Funded by: UNHCR id21 Research Highlight: 30 May 2003
Further Information: Tel:
+44 (0)1865 395810
Team leader for the evaluation: Tel:
+1 (0)646 229 2042 or +1 (0)212 880 9157
Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit (EPAU) Tel:
+41 22 739 8111 Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, UNHCR Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||