|
|
||||||||||||||||
There is growing concern that globalisation threatens the ability of developing countries to address social policy concerns. Is there a need for a global regulatory framework to protect social rights? Should the international financial institutions (IFI) be getting involved in social policy or would a new institution to deal with social policy be more likely to win support? A background report commissioned by DFID for the 2000 White Paper on globalisation charts some of the debates regarding the integration of pro-poor economic and social policy frameworks. In assessing proposals to improve the international architecture of economic and social governance, the report suggests ways to overcome the north-south tensions which have impeded progress. The report considers the evidence that inequality is increasing with globalisation, and the possible causes – concluding that there is strong evidence of increases in inequality both at the national and the inter-country level over the last thirty years. This is due to a range of factors. The gap between the best and lowest paid is widening, states are abandoning redistributive ambitions, organised labour is in decline and the share of total global income derived from capital is increasing. The scope of governments to fund social expenditure has been reduced as liberalisation restricts revenue from trade-related taxes, encourages the move from payroll to consumption taxes, and gives multinationals new scope to avoid tax demands. The report looks at the factors driving enhanced awareness of the international dimensions of social policy. The flow of labour migrants is prompting developed states to consider how to improve the conditions that trigger migration. The ethical trade initiative, the international debt relief campaign and anti-WTO coalitions attest to the power of new forms of civil society action based on notions of global solidarity. Other points made by the report include:
While the outcomes of the 1995 UN social policy summit in Copenhagen and its 2000 review in Geneva have disappointed those arguing for robust international mechanisms to enforce social policy principles, they have fostered an informal climate in which a number of radical proposals are being mooted. These include:
Source(s): Funded by: Department for International Development id21 Research Highlight: 27 June 2002
Further Information: Tel:
+44 (0)20 7922 0380 Overseas Development Institute, UK Other related links:
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||