|
|
|||||||||||||||
African producers exporting fresh fruit, vegetables and flowers to UK supermarkets now have to meet codes of conduct covering their conditions of employment. Much of the workforce is female seasonal labour, with men predominantly occupying permanent and more secure work. Employment conditions are often far worse for women. The gender-sensitivity of many company codes is weak with little stakeholder participation at a local level. Unless gender issues are addressed, ethical trade may not improve the employment conditions of the majority workforce. Recent research has mapped the codes of conduct currently being applied to horticultural exports in South Africa, Kenya and Zambia, examining and assessing the codes from a gender perspective. Numerous sets of codes are being applied including independent codes, private company codes, and sectoral codes produced by trade associations. The gender sensitivity and content of the codes varies widely. Some simply refer to national legislation (which can vary enormously between countries) as the basis for employment standards. The majority uses ILO core conventions as their basis, but still fail to cover important issues facing the majority female labour force. Some are more comprehensive but uneven in their coverage of gender issues. The gender content of codes is variable and can be extremely weak. How far are gender issues addressed in code implementation? It is clear that there is little or no stakeholder participation in the monitoring or verification of codes in the horticultural sector. Some professional auditors carried out brief consultation with local stakeholders but implementation of codes, however, depends largely on auditing by technologists from supermarkets, importers or exporters with little or no training in social auditing. Audits are unlikely to identify gender issues and can miss glaring problems. If codes of conduct are to improve the working conditions of all workers, including the majority female temporary labour force, gender issues need to be given a much higher priority in the monitoring and verification of codes. Mechanisms are needed that address the interests of female as well as male workers and ensure that local stakeholders are incorporated into the process. There is an urgent need to:
Source(s): Funded by: Department for International Development (Escor R7525) 2000-2001 id21 Research Highlight: 9 October 2001
Further Information: Tel:
+44 (0) 1273 877032 Institute of Development Studies (IDS), UK Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||