|
|
|||||||||||||||
Are the concerns of vulnerable and poor men sufficiently integrated into gender and development interventions? Have policymakers understood the consequences of economic and social change for poorly educated men and those on the fringes of household units headed by women? How can more men become collaborators, instead of obstructers, of the goals of gender equality? A paper from Oxfam GB looks at the position of men in current Gender and Development (GAD) analysis. Findings from interviews with gender specialists in 30 major non-governmental, bilateral and multilateral development agencies assess the male-friendliness of gender-planning frameworks and what happens when men are excluded from GAD interventions. It looks at the extent to which gender training reflects the reconceptualisation of men inherent in the move from Women in Development (WID) to GAD. Rejecting sweeping generalisations about males, the paper argues for a more sophisticated understanding of how gender, race, and poverty interlink to disadvantage particular categories of men and women. Where should agencies locate responsibility for gender? Is the goal of mainstreaming gender best served by maintaining GAD-specific machineries or do specialist units perpetuate the isolation of gender concerns from mainstream programming? The report cautions against following Oxfam’s example and abolishing specialist units until there is more convincing evidence for fundamental changes in gender attitudes. Have things really changed? The World Bank, like many agencies formally committed to GAD, still slips into using the terms ‘gender’ and ‘women’ as if they are synonyms. Patriarchal culture still rules. Clusters of men at the top of development agencies and southern governments create a formidable obstacle to GAD. Even in supposedly gender-aware agencies, complacent male staff perceive their organisation to be more gender-equal than their female counterparts do. The report also draws attention to:
How can men be more involved in GAD? Can they be helped to go beyond verbal recognition of the issues involved in gender relations to the practical changes required to transform gender inequalities? The study urges agencies to:
Source(s): Funded by: World Bank, Nuffield Foundation, UK ESRC, Oxfam GB id21 Research Highlight: 23 November 2001
Further Information: Tel:
+44 (0)1865 311 311 Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||