Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Global Issues
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Global Issues
  Population change
  Food security
  Climate change
  Gender
  Poverty
  Human rights
  Global economy
  Governance
  Aid
  Conflict
and emergencies
  Tourism
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
On the scrap heap? Better livelihoods for Bangladeshi waste pickers

Can the sustainable livelihoods approach (SLA), developed to study rural livelihoods, be adapted for an urban environment? Can it be fine-tuned to capture information and livelihood strategies of marginalized and illiterate children?

These issues are explored in a report by Loughborough University’s Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC) which uses the SLA to look at the lives of waste pickers in Dhaka. The study contributes to better methodological understanding of the SLA and adds to the relatively small body of work relating to practical sustainable livelihoods of the poorest of the urban poor.

Waste pickers, most of them seven to fourteen year old boys, collect and sell paper, plastics, glass, bones and metals from landfill sites, skips and street dumps. Most live on the streets or in slums where they have little access to infrastructure, a low status in society and an uncertain future. They work in the morning when pickings are best and as a result few attend school. The slum areas in which they live are at risk from fire, flooding and demolition. Seasonality charts prepared during focus groups indicated that life is particularly hard in the wet season and better after Eid festivals when the quantity and quality of waste increases.

In line with the holistic approach of the SLA model used by the UK Department for International Development, the study looked at the pickers’ livelihoods from four related concepts: vulnerability (including trends, shocks and seasonality), livelihood assets (human, social, natural, physical and financial capitals), transforming structures (institutions and legislation which impacts their lives) and livelihood strategies and outcomes.

The findings indicated that:

  • Waste pickers have complex livelihoods and livelihood strategies.
  • Variation in the circumstances of pickers and the nature and quantities of waste shows that pickers cannot be conceptualised as a single group.
  • Pickers are aware that better-paid work (especially in the garment industry) is available but the opportunity cost of not working for the time taken to acquire skills is prohibitive.
  • The relationship between the pickers and dealers who buy products for recycling does not appear to be exploitative, but rather supportive.
  • The key to empowerment of pickers is improving human capital.
  • Successful SLA involves pictures, humour and entertainment and avoids listening only to the confident and ignoring those with ‘quiet voices’.
  • Rather than stick dogmatically to the concepts of the SLA it is more important to put the ideas behind it into research practice.

Among the pointers for policy-makers and donors is the need for:

  • afternoon schooling or a loan system to make the opportunity cost of education or skills acquisition more affordable
  • acknowledgement of the tension between wider environmental and development interests and the interests of pickers - improved solid waste management could cause waste pickers to lose their livelihoods and their social networks and support structures
  • scoping how pickers could become door-to-door collectors in an improved municipal waste collection scheme
  • further research, with a wider sample of pickers, to disentangle the impact of gender, caste and age on livelihood activities and strategies.

Source(s):
‘Waste Pickers in Dhaka: Using the sustainable livelihoods approach – Key findings and field notes’, by Jonathan Rouse and Mansoor Ali, WEDC, Loughborough University, 2001 Full document.

Funded by: WEDC

id21 Research Highlight: 25 April 2001

Further Information:
Jonathan Rouse
WEDC Loughborough University
Leicestershire LE11 3TU
UK

Tel: +44 (0)1509 222885
Fax: +44 (0)1509 211079
Contact the contributor: J.R.Rouse@lboro.ac.uk

Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC), University of Loughborough, UK

Other related links:
Livelihoods Connect focuses on research information on sustainable living

Refer to GSSD for knowledge networks on sustainable development

UNDP provides a broad selection on human development and livelihoods

The Child Rights Information Network works at improving the lives of chlidren

SDI provides news and resources on sustainable development

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 6th October 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the Water, Engineering and Development Centre (WEDC), University of Loughborough, UK site.