Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Global Issues
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Global Issues
  Population change
  Food security
  Climate change
  Gender
  Poverty
  Human rights
  Global economy
  Governance
  Aid
  Conflict
and emergencies
  Tourism
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Pro-poor tourism: opportunities for the poor?

Everyone knows that tourism affects the world's poorest countries and people. But just how great is its impact? Can tourism work for the benefit of the poor? Can tourism be developed to bring economic gains and engagement in decision making to those in greatest need?

Tourism is one of the world’s largest industries. It is widely agreed that pro-poor tourism strategies - or PPT - are necessary to harness the potential of tourism for poverty reduction. However, there is little experience on how to do this. New research looks at several recent interventions and assesses their strategies, progress and impact to identify good practice and determine the effectiveness of PPT.

The focus and scale of PPT interventions vary enormously. They range from individual private enterprises working with poor neighbours, to national programmes that enhance participation at all levels. PPT strategies often include community tourism but also go well beyond. They are not confined to any one sub-sector, product or market niche.

The report contains preliminary findings on implementation of PPT strategies and their impact. Recognising caveats on the difficulty of ascribing causality and measuring impact, it notes that, in general, PPT initiatives:

  • give small but significant earnings for poor individuals: a few people have been lifted out of poverty; many more supplement their income through occasional and part-time engagement
  • offer a range of valuable non-financial benefits that decrease vulnerability, such as access to information and infrastructure
  • produce a fairly wide though unequal spread of benefits
  • increase demand for the goods and services of the poor which in turn enhances their assets, reduces the negative impact of growth, and supports livelihood diversification
  • spread pro-poor policy processes
  • are particularly valuable in marginal areas.

As PPT strategies are generally at the early stages or limited to specific destinations, they so far have only had a minor effect on national poverty indicators. The report suggests, however, that PPT strategies have potential for wider application, resulting in a marginal change in a massive industry, thus generating new opportunities and benefits for the poor.

For making PPT approaches effective, the study recommends:

  • strategies that expand formal and informal economic opportunities, access to assets, and opportunities for participation
  • while also addressing key factors relating to commercial viability, location, pace, and costs.

The study concludes that extending PPT strategies across the industry is most likely if:

  • tourism planners and practitioners incorporate pro-poor concerns at all levels
  • growth and poverty strategies exploit the comparative advantage of tourism at specific locations
  • businesses get involved on the basis of commercial opportunity
  • the ‘sustainable tourism’ agenda shifts from environment to poverty and from north to south.

Source(s):
'Pro-poor tourism strategies: Making tourism work for the poor,' Pro-poor tourism report #1, Overseas Development Institute, International Institute for Environment and Development, and Centre for Responsible Tourism, University of Greenwich by C. Ashley, D. Roe and H. Goodwin, 2001
'Pro-poor tourism: Expanding opportunities for the poor,' Pro-poor tourism Policy Briefing #1, Overseas Development Institute, International Institute for Environment and Development, and Centre for Responsible Tourism, University of Greenwich by C. Ashley, D. Roe and H. Goodwin, 2001

Funded by: DFID (Escor)

id21 Research Highlight: 1 February 2002

Further Information:
Caroline Ashley
Overseas Development Institute
111 Westminster Bridge Road
London SE1 7JD
UK

Contact the contributor: c.ashley@odi.org.uk

Overseas Development Institute, UK

Pro-Poor Tourism

Other related links:
'Tourism in Namibia: enhancing livelihood impacts'

'Pro-poor tourism: putting poverty at the heart of mass tourism'

IES works to promote ecotourism as a tool of conservation and sustainable development

The World Tourism Organisation serves as a global forum for tourism policy issues

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 1st September 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the Overseas Development Institute, UK site.

 

 

Go to the Pro-Poor Tourism site.