|
|
|||||||||||||||
The South African government has worked to establish a legal framework to support decentralised local economic development. It has also begun using a Rural Economic Enterprise Development approach to rural poverty alleviation. What lessons can this provide for local development? Rural Economic Enterprise Development (REED) aims to develop an institutional framework that promotes enterprise development, economic diversification and innovation in the rural economy, and stimulate links between agriculture and non-farm activities. It stresses the need for local government, the private and not-for-profit sectors, and local communities to work together to develop the local economy. A report from the Natural Resources Institute in the UK describes the REED approach to local economic development (LED) in the Free State, South Africa. It also analyses five-year integrated development plans in two districts, Dihlabeng and Xhariep, in terms of REED. In the Free State, there has been little infrastructure development to support small business development initiatives. The rural non-farm economy, which generates a quarter of employment and accounts for 21 percent of the economy, is being affected by migration from rural areas to small towns, where economic opportunities are also limited. Integrated development plans have the potential to coordinate LED better with other strategies. They provide a legal and regulatory framework for achieving economic growth and poverty reduction. They also clarify the roles, responsibilities and participation of civil society, the government and the private sector in achieving these aims. The success of integrated development plans in Dihlabeng and Xhariep has been mixed: Both municipalities’ plans have poverty and economic development as objectives. In Dihlabeng, however, poverty reduction programmes only address the effects of poverty, not the causes, and do not consider this in relation to economic growth. Xhariep’s poverty reduction strategy is more integrated and is the main objective of LED. Both assign resources for healthcare, social infrastructure, communication, and training, which is critical in poverty relief intervention. Both districts focus on tourism as a key economic driver, although this has yet to be proven effective. While Xhariep also maintains the central role of agriculture, Dihlabeng focuses on this less and explores manufacturing and services instead. Effective mechanisms for involving civil society, especially poor people, are missing from Dihlabeng’s plan. Experience of using the REED approach in the Free State, and lessons from analysing the two municipals’ integrated development plans, highlight the importance of:
Source(s): Funded by: UK Department for International Development (Policy Orientated Research Programme – PORP, R8369) id21 Research Highlight: 11 October 2007
Further Information: Tel:
+44 (0)1634 880088 Natural Resources Institute, UK
Daniela Tavasci Tel:
+44 (0)20 76372388 Department of Economics, School of Oriental and African Studies, UK
Lochner Marais Tel:
+27 (0)51 4012978 Centre for Development Support University of the Free State, South Africa Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||