|
|
||||||||||||||||
Safe hygiene practices and access to sanitation are crucial for combating the main health threats to children. However, nearly twice as many people lack access to sanitation compared with water supply. Is it time to stop aligning sanitation and health (S&H) policies so closely with water management policy? A paper from Tearfund, researched and written by ACCEDES, one of Tearfund’s local partners, together with the Overseas Development Institute, in the UK, investigates barriers to sanitation and hygiene promotion in five villages in Burkina Faso. Researchers focused on safe disposal of human excreta and safe hygiene practices – the elements of basic S&H that are lacking in most sub-Saharan and other developing countries. In Burkina Faso demand for sanitation is low to non-existent and hygiene behaviour is lax. This is due to a lack of knowledge of the health benefits of safe hygiene practices and sanitation facilities, combined with the prevalence of socio-cultural attitudes that support open defecation. Researchers found most villagers could not make the link between contaminated water and disease. For instance, the general reason given for diarrhoea was malaria. Most households lack the financial means or technical expertise to construct latrines. Some cannot even afford soap. Local officials lack capacity to help. Some bureaucrats interviewed did not perceive sanitation as a public responsibility, saying latrine construction was a private household affair. Problems that Burkina Faso shares with many other developing countries include:
Sanitation has been incorporated alongside water supply in Target 10 of the Millennium Development Goals. The increasingly popular ‘water, sanitation and hygiene’ (WASH) concept argues for integrating improved water sources with better household handling and storage of water and management of human excreta. However, a key challenge for policymakers is to agree what is meant by ‘sanitation’ and ‘hygiene’. Uncritical use of ‘sanitation’ risks blurring the distinction between on-site methods of handling human waste and connections to sewer systems. There is also a danger of separating WASH issues from other problems faced by poor people such as lack of safe housing and insecure land tenure. Lessons learned in Burkina Faso include:
Source(s): Funded by: Tearfund id21 Research Highlight: 14 March 2008
Further Information: Tel:
+44 20 79220300 Water Policy Programme, Overseas Development Institute, UK Other related links:
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||