Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Rural Development
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Rural Development
  Community
organisation
  Rural transport
  Rural communication
  Rural water and
sanitation
  Rural employment
and income
  Rural energy
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Should policymakers support small enterprises?

Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are common in developing countries. They often comprise the majority of businesses and provide a high proportion of employment. However, SMEs are diverse: policy interventions must understand what they are dealing with to successfully contribute towards sustainable development, rather than detract from it.

Almost all researchers and policymakers agree that there is a need for policies in favour of SMEs. This is sometimes because there are so many of them, sometimes because of distinct benefits to poor people that merit support and sometimes because market and institutional biases against small scale businesses need to be rectified.

Research from the International Institute of Environment and Development, UK, highlights some promising opportunities for successful policy interventions. SMEs are especially critical in times of change. They help:

  • rural households to diversify and adapt to increasingly urban patterns of development
  • households cope with transitions from state-controlled economies to market-driven economies
  • households adjust to shifts away from family labour towards waged employment
  • to maintain the supply of culturally specific products and services that might be missed by larger global enterprises.

However, SMEs do not always offer a way forward. SMEs often lack bargaining power in competitive markets and suffer from high transaction costs. In many cases,  SMEs pay less attention to worker welfare and the environment than larger enterprises. It is often difficult for larger businesses to work with SMEs, which are usually less formal and timely in their operations and spread across wide areas. Informality is also a challenge for policymakers looking to support (and collect revenues from) SMEs.

A complicated mixture of institutional partnerships and policy support can help or hinder SMEs. For example, a medium-scale cashew-processing factory in Mozambique employs approximately 100 local people, who have contracts and good working conditions. The factory was designed with the help of Technoserve and set up in an old government building. It was made possible by the strong relationship between the entrepreneur and a Dutch non-governmental organisation linked to a Dutch cashew nut buyer. Government taxes that encourage in-country nut processing form part of the policies that made it work.

By contrast, policies in the Red River Delta, Vietnam, are less supportive to SMEs. About 80 percent of non-farm employment is in handicraft SMEs. Despite this importance to local livelihoods, government programmes to support rural industries do not include these enterprises. Programmes have a minimum size for enterprises, which is too large for many handicraft SMEs. They also require advance payments from enterprises that are unaffordable.

There is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ policy framework to support SMEs. This diversity means that debates about the merits of supporting SMEs will continue. However, three particular areas merit further support:

  • Investigating and designing models for incentive, competition and procurement policies that support SMEs without compromising bilateral and multilateral commitments.
  • Supporting particular types of SME association that build entrepreneurial capacity and market power without strengthening local elites.
  • Helping SMEs to negotiate special provisions within standard and labelling schemes that often discriminate against them.

Source(s):
‘Small scale enterprise and sustainable development: key issues and policy opportunities to improve impact’ IIED Policy Discussion paper, IIED: Edinburgh, by Duncan Macqueen, 2005 Full document.

Funded by: Swiss Development Corporation (SDC); UK Department for International Development (DFID)

id21 Research Highlight: 24 March 2006

Further Information:
Duncan Macqueen
Forestry and Land Use Programme
International Institute of Environment and Development
4 Hanover Street
Edinburgh, EH2 2EN
UK

Tel: +44 (0) 131 226 6860
Fax: +44 (0) 131 624 7050
Contact the contributor: duncan.macqueen@iied.org

International Institute of Environment and Development, UK

Other related links:
'The benefits of working together: small and medium forest enterprises'

'Formalising informal enterprises without damaging job opportunities'

'Business development support to small service providers'

'Investment incentives: do they help Ethiopian enterprises?'

'Learning process affects business growth in Latin America'

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 30th June 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21


id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development www.dfid.gov.uk
id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies www.ids.ac.uk at the University of Sussex www.sussex.ac.uk
IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of
www.mediachannel.org

 

 

Go to the International Institute of Environment and Development, UK site.