Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Natural Resources
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Natural Resources
  Agriculture
  Conservation and
biodiversity
  Fisheries
  Forestry
  Land and soils
  Water
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Health
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Rwandan orphans denied land rights

The genocide in 1994, combined with the impacts of HIV/AIDS, has created thousands of orphans in Rwanda. These orphans – many the heads of households – urgently need land use rights. A weakened system of guardianship and increasing pressures on land often prevent this.

There are 34 million orphans in Africa, 11 million of who are ‘AIDS orphans’. Many orphans are poorly cared for and subject to abuse and exploitation. Traditional support systems for orphans in Africa, whereby family members were expected to take care of and defend the rights of orphans, have weakened over the years. African governments have been unable to respond with adequate formal legal and social systems.

The situation is particularly acute in Rwanda, where the genocide of 1994 and a deepening AIDS crisis have created up to 300,000 orphans. Even before the Rwandan genocide, land pressures and poverty meant that many families were competing for land. The genocide, with over 600,000 Tutsi and Hutu deaths and an estimated 4 million refugees, led to a larger-scale land crisis. The crisis in guardianship and land rights has only worsened with the increase in AIDS orphans.

Independent research by Dr. Laurel L. Rose, USA, looks at the current status of orphans in Rwanda with regard to land rights. Key findings include:

  • Many orphans in Africa are heads of their households, yet their land rights are often neglected.
  • Guardians do not always respect or recognise orphans’ land rights. Following the war in Rwanda there have been many cases of guardians taking advantage of orphans.
  • The existing customary and national laws and policies provide little support for orphans, despite the Rwandan Civil Law on Property in 2000.
  • Orphans experience many practical barriers: these include a lack of information; time (for example with orphans returning after the war to find their land taken over); status; few financial resources to administrative and legal forums to defend their land rights.

These factors have led to considerable frustration for orphans who, as head of households, are struggling to survive. The research recommends that the Rwandan government recognise the changing nature of guardianship by:

  • developing a legal framework that  includes the concept of ‘active legal capacity’, especially for minors, so orphans are granted legal rights based on their maturity and need to be independent, rather than age
  • formulating and enforcing land laws specifically catering to orphans’ rights, as separate from adult rights
  • better regulating and supporting traditional guardianship for orphans
  • implementing new forms of care giving that also provide orphans with access to information and legal and administrative aid
  • evaluating orphan intervention programmes, such as those involving community volunteers to work on orphans’ fields (this has been used in other African nations)
  • broadening the definition of ‘family’ in post-war Rwanda, for example through ‘children’s villages’
  • designing national land development programmes with the full participation of orphans.

Source(s):
‘Orphan’s Land Rights in Post-war Rwanda: the Problem of Guardianship’, Development and Change 36 (5), pages 911-936, by Laurel L. Rose, 2005 Full document.

Funded by: United States Institute of Peace

id21 Research Highlight: 31 March 2006

Further Information:
Laurel L. Rose
Philosophy Department
Carnegie Mellon University
Forbes Avenue
Pittsburgh
PA 15213
USA

Contact the contributor: laurel@andrew.cmu.edu

Carnegie Mellon University, USA

Other related links:
'New approaches to land management and security in Africa'

'Land access in conflict situations: can sustainable livelihoods play a role?'

'Exploring the causes of armed conflict in Africa'

'Land disputes in Ghana: can the state courts deal with them?'

'Does AIDS threaten the right to land?'

See id21's links on land and soils

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 1st September 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the Carnegie Mellon University, USA site.