|
|
|||||||||||||||
Recent water debates have focused on personal and domestic use, but water used for agriculture gets less attention. Projects to improve access to water for agriculture often fail to consider property rights issues. This can undermine land tenure security, contribute to the loss of resources and create conflict. Rain-fed farming and pastoralism are the main forms of agriculture in Sahelian countries. In the past few decades, there have been efforts to improve the water infrastructure in rural areas – for example through the creation of new water points and irrigation schemes. Research from the International Institute for Environment and Development, UK, explored land and water rights issues for water projects in the Sahel. The research focused on irrigation schemes and pastoral water points in Burkina Faso, Mali, Niger and Senegal, as well as projects to improve wetlands management. Land and water rights are closely linked in irrigation schemes. Many farmers have insecure land use rights and these have several conditions attached. For example, if farmers do not pay water fees they are evicted from the land. This creates incentives for farmers to pay fees, which is good for the viability of a scheme. But during bad harvests, it may mean that farmers lose land they have cultivated for generations without receiving compensation. Farmers need fee-payment mechanisms that cater for harvest fluctuations, such as rescheduling payments in bad years, or enabling them to rent out land. Key research findings include:
Water and land laws have evolved with little coordination and, in some respects, in different directions. Furthermore, recent laws on administrative decentralisation may contradict land and water laws. There is still a significant gap between government legislation and local practice, despite government efforts to regulate resource access and management in publicly funded water infrastructure schemes. Property rights issues must be taken seriously in programmes to increase water security. Solutions must fit with current legislation and be acceptable to local users. Considering this, practitioners and policymakers must:
Source(s): Funded by: Food and Agriculture Organisation; Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency id21 Research Highlight: 8 September 2006
Further Information: Tel:
+44 (0)20 7388 2117 International Institute for Environment and Development, UK Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||