|
|
|||||||||||||||
In areas affected by disasters such as drought and war, recovering agricultural activity quickly is vital to household food security. Relief seed aid, which replaces seeds lost during disasters, is important to ensure that farmers have adequate quantities of quality seeds of the right variety for the planting season following a disaster. Relief seed approaches to assist agriculture recovery in Africa have traditionally relied on formal seed systems, such as seeds provided by large seed companies. For example, relief seed approaches in Kenya, Zimbabwe and Malawi focus on maize seeds, an important commercial crop in these countries. Governments, donors and non-governmental organisations have supported formal relief seed strategies that provide farmers with commercial seeds, believing that informal farmer-based relief seed systems fail after disasters; seeds are unavailable, inaccessible (often too expensive) or of low quality. However, using seeds from the commercial sector has several problems, including poor seed quality, late delivery and inappropriate varieties. Furthermore, maize seed aid has not been effective in increasing seed system resilience, questioning the effectiveness of commercial relief seed aid. Recent research from Catholic Relief Services (CRS), USA shows that informal relief seed aid using existing farmer seed systems can form the basis of an efficient and effective relief seed approach. Farmer-based relief seed approaches are common in countries without a significant commercial seed system, such as Burundi, or countries where the commercial focus is a small niche market, such as Ethiopia. In particular, evidence from the CRS Seed Vouchers & Fairs (SF&V) demonstrates the effectiveness of farmer-centred approaches to seed aid. SV&F allow small farmers to access local seed markets and inject large amounts of cash into local economies, which is invested in agriculture and health care. Evidence from Burundi and Malawi shows:
Informal farmer relief seed systems are an important source of seeds for many small farmers; evidence increasingly shows this remains true during times of crisis following disasters. Policymakers should dedicate more resources to using these informal systems for seed aid relief where appropriate. The research recommends:
Source(s): Funded by: United States Agency for International Development, Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance id21 Research Highlight: 11 November 2005
Further Information: Tel:
+254 (0) 20 3750788 Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||