![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
|
|
Micro-enterprise and the 'mobile divide'New benefits and old inequalities in Nigeria's informal sectorMobile phones are starting to penetrate the informal sector in developing countries. Do they bring benefits? Reinforce inequalities? Both? Information is vital to trade. Yet trade in the informal sector is shaped by information challenges. Information may be absent – for instance customers do not know who to buy from. Information may be uncertain – suppliers can be unsure about what prices they can charge. Information may be asymmetrical – some participants know more than others. Micro-entrepreneurs can, therefore, spend a lot of time travelling in order to gather information. They also rely on middlemen – the link between them and their customers – who hold vital information. Mobile phones are starting to be used in this context. Can they make a difference? A study of mobiles in the aso oke (hand-woven textile) sector in south-western Nigeria addresses this question. This is an informal industry that suffers from typical information challenges. Customers and producers have traditionally relied heavily on middlemen, travel and meetings. Trade has been slow, costly and even risky, given the physical dangers of travel in Nigeria. The study found mobile phones benefit everyone in the aso oke industry. They provide the first reliable access to telecommunications. They also:
However, the need to inspect items being produced, the complexity of product design and the lack of trust between participants, means a continuing need for physical meetings. Mobiles therefore cannot substitute for all travel. In addition, mobiles help reinforce existing structures and inequalities. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) promise to remove self-serving middlemen from trade. In the aso oke industry, however, middlemen are driving the adoption of mobiles, using them to consolidate their power and influence. ICTs also promise to make the situation more equal for everyone involved. Yet it appears that mobiles are increasing the difference between those who can afford access to a mobile (who find greater opportunities to trade) and those who cannot (who find they have fewer orders). Also, micro-entrepreneurs with established business networks benefit more because access to a phone rarely leads to new business contacts. It is important to recognise that:
Abi Jagun See also Mobile Telephony and Developing Country Micro-Enterprise, Development Informatics Working Papers, IDPM, University of Manchester, by Abi Jagun, Richard Heeks & Jason Whalley, 2007 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) any article may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided both source (id21, insights) and authors are properly acknowledged and informed. Copyright © 2006 id21. All rights reserved. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||