Go to the id21 home page

id21 logo

id21 insights

id21 logo

Issue #67

New directions for water governance

Customary laws

The question of scale

Money matters in Tanzania

Rural water supply in Nigeria

Achieving water security

Water rights

Competition for water

Rethinking the management of agricultural water

Useful web links

PDF version

Send us your comments on this issue

id21 Home

id21 Society & Economy

id21 Health

id21 Urban Poverty

id21 Education

About id21

Links

Contact id21

Site map

Recovering the costs of rural water supply

Community initiatives in Nigeria

Community members with repaired boreholes in Iyamayong, Obubra Local Government Area of Cross River State in Nigeria
Community members with repaired boreholes in Iyamayong, Obubra Local Government Area of Cross River State in Nigeria. Robin Todd, 2006 (Larger version)

Inadequate water supply and poor sanitation are serious problems for rural communities in Cross River State, southern Nigeria. Concern Universal works with these communities to strengthen their capacity to manage water and sanitation facilities.

Surveys such as the 2006 Core Welfare Indicators Questionnaire Survey show that only 14 percent of rural households have access to safe water sources; only 24 percent have access to safe sanitation facilities. These are among the lowest figures in southern Nigeria, and may be due to a historic lack of investment by the federal and state governments.

The role of non-governmental organisations in water governance is to facilitate community-led initiatives that promote self reliance and equal access. This is important in areas where communities do not trust governments to protect their interests, or fulfil their role as service providers and regulators.

Since 2001, Concern Universal has worked on projects in Cross River State to increase the role of communities in governing rural water supply and sanitation. Concern Universal has developed a model characterised by:

  • designing community-based management structures around existing local institutions. For example, Age-Grade systems help to ensure fair access. However, some traditional rulers take an active role in management, which can reinforce existing inequalities and patterns of resource control.
  • total community self-reliance for borehole operations and maintenance. Concern Universal trained and equipped men and women from each community to repair and maintain hand-pumps. This achieved encouraging results, with almost 90 percent of surveyed water points fully functional more than twelve months after project completion.
  • sustainable low-cost solutions. Concern Universal encouraged protecting natural springs (using a new method developed by Concern Universal's partner GRADO) and repairing existing hand-pump boreholes instead of drilling new boreholes.

Cost-recovery systems

To deliver effective services, water governance requires inter-related systems operated by many sections of society. If these services are to be maintained, governance arrangements must provide for cost recovery. Cost recovery systems designed by communities are most effective, enabling communities to sustain existing facilities while still allowing widespread access to safe water.

Practices vary between communities. Some introduced household levies for commercial uses, such as moulding blocks or cooking rice for sale. On average, these were equivalent to US$0.40 per household per month. In some places, community funds were used to repair infrastructure breakdowns. People were then charged 'per bucket' for water until the community water and sanitation bank account was replenished. A portion of profits from community-run 'Sanicentres' were also used to repair breakdowns. However, no communities introduced charges 'per-bucket' as a standard cost recovery method.

Concern Universal has identified policy implications for working with communities to manage water supplies:

  • 'One size fits all' solutions to cost recovery are not appropriate; systems should be based around normal community practices.
  • A community contribution is essential for sustainability, but it is the principle that is important, not the actual method of contribution.
  • To be sustainable, cost recovery processes should cover annual operation and maintenance costs.

Robin Todd
Concern Universal, 41 IBB Way, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria
robin.todd@concern-universal.org
T +234 87238828

See also

Core Welfare Indicator Questionnaire – Cross River State Summary, National Bureau of Statistics, 2006 (PDF)
www.nigerianstat.gov.ng/Connections/cwiq/Cross%20River.pdf

Annual Report 2005-6, Concern Universal-Nigeria, 2006

FREE Information Delivery services from id21:

Get updates by email: ID21 news

id21 is enabled by the UK Government Department for International Development and hosted by the Institute of Development Studies, at the University of Sussex, UK. Charitable Company No. 877338. id21 is a oneworld.net partner and a mediachannel affiliate

Right-to-Reply:
Comment on any of the issues raised in this Insights.
Read what others have said.

Top of the page

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) any article may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided both source (id21, insights) and authors are properly acknowledged and informed. Copyright © 2006 id21. All rights reserved.