![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
|
|
Government support in Lao PDRHow effective is it?Foreign exchange from tourism (over US$ 146 million in 2005) significantly benefits the national economy in the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR). This money stimulates local production and consumption in many sectors, including transport, agriculture and education, but does it benefit poor people?
After several successful community-based projects, the government is prioritising tourism to fight poverty and stimulate further economic growth. The government's role in pro-poor tourism is to create and enforce agreements that outline the roles and responsibilities of poor communities and ensure that they receive a reasonable share of tourism earnings. Strategies for pro-poor tourismThe government's recent National Tourism Strategy and Action Plan (2006 - 2015) and the National Ecotourism Strategy both emphasise pro-poor tourism, particularly products and services that benefit poor rural communities. For example, culture and nature-based tourism are often pro-poor: villagers work as guides and site managers and provide accommodation and transport. Poor people benefit directly by selling food and drinks, traditional handicrafts and other local products to tourists. The government can further support pro-poor tourism by:
Local objections to tourismDespite the potential and existing benefits, public support for pro-poor tourism is not always forthcoming. One controversial issue is large-scale tourism on ancestral lands. If poor people do not receive adequate compensation for the loss of their land and access to natural resources, tourism may actually increase poverty. The Lao PDR government has largely avoided this so far. However, the development of a large casino and resort on the Lao PDR-China border threatens this trend. This new type of tourism, which is mainly funded by foreign investment, has yet to prove it will reduce poverty. It therefore requires careful monitoring and strong regulation to ensure that local people benefit. The government must also decide whether to allow natural resource extraction and industrial development in areas with high tourism potential. But with thoughtful land-use planning strategies and zoning plans, it is possible to attract socially responsible investment, industrialise the national economy and protect the natural and cultural resources that support pro-poor tourism. Steven Schipani Thaviphet Oula See also Lao PDR Biodiversity: Economic Assessment, IUCN: Vientiane, Lao PDR, by S. Bouttavong, L. Emerton, L. Kettavong, S. Manivong and S. Sivannavong, 2002 Ecotourism Laos Annual Statistics Report, Vientiane: Lao PDR, Lao National Tourism Administration, 2005 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) any article may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided both source (id21, insights) and authors are properly acknowledged and informed. Copyright © 2006 id21. All rights reserved. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||