Go to the id21 home page

id21 logo

insights

id21 logo

Issue #61

Achieving food security

Research works in Ethiopia

Would a green revolution work in sub-Saharan Africa?

Can fertiliser subsidies help farmers out of poverty?

Maize production in Zambia

Are fertiliser subsidies necessary? Yes, but...

Is food aid effective?

Does tying matter?

Nutrition and food quality

Responding to early warnings

Useful web links

PDF version

Send us your comments on this issue

id21 Home

id21 Society & Economy

id21 Health

id21 Urban Poverty

id21 Education

About id21

Links

Contact id21

Site map

Maize production in Zambia

Maize production has fallen in Zambia since liberalisation in the early 1990s as fertiliser became less affordable and subsidies did not reach many farmers. The country's poor agricultural performance is negatively affecting nutrition: the proportion of stunted children has risen from 36 to 47 percent since 1990.

Diversification into cash crops has partly offset this trend, but this is mainly by commercial farmers and is concentrated in Eastern, Central and Southern Provinces. Smallholder farmers, especially in remote areas, have gone back to traditional staple crops to feed their families, mainly cassava and millet, as these require less fertiliser and seed. As a result, incomes have fallen and diets are less varied, with limited access to fruit and vegetables.

Research in three villages in the Northern Province by the UK Institute of Development Studies demonstrates what has happened in Zambia over the last two decades. In Ngulula, Lufubu and Kabila farmers have moved into maize production and out again. Today, cassava and millet are the most widespread crops, although maize production remains common, especially local varieties. Yet many farmers told researchers how they used to grow and sell maize until fertilisers became unaffordable.

The Zambian government has reintroduced fertiliser subsidies in the last two years, but access to these is uneven. Even with a subsidy, fertiliser use is constrained by poor infrastructure, especially for remote, 'off-road' communities. Problems with water availability and the high cost of other inputs, including seed and herbicide, further limit opportunities to grow high-value export crops.

Farmers are caught in a poverty trap: they cannot afford the necessary inputs to increase production, and lack access to markets even if they could. Improving market access alone will not improve livelihoods. Supply-side measures - particularly improved infrastructure and the formation of farmer cooperatives - must be complemented by policies to stimulate demand, such as public works (for example, road construction and irrigation infrastructure) and feeding programmes using local produce.

Jennifer Leavy and Howard White
Vulnerability and Poverty Reduction Team, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RE, UK
T +44 (0)1273 678747
F +44 (0)1273 621202
J.Leavy@ids.ac.uk
HowardW@ids.ac.uk
www.ids.ac.uk

See also

'Agricultural Development in Zambia's Northern Province: Perspectives from the Field Level', IDS Bulletin 36 (2), pages 132-138, by Howard White, Jennifer Leavy and Venkatesh Seshamani, 2005

FREE Information Delivery services from id21:

Get updates by email: ID21 news

id21 is enabled by the UK Government Department for International Development and hosted by the Institute of Development Studies, at the University of Sussex, UK. Charitable Company No. 877338. id21 is a oneworld.net partner and a mediachannel affiliate

Right-to-Reply:
Comment on any of the issues raised in this Insights.
Read what others have said.

Top of the page

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) any article may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided both source (id21, insights) and authors are properly acknowledged and informed. Copyright © 2006 id21. All rights reserved.