Go to the id21 home page

id21 logo

insights

id21 logo

Issue #57

People and protected areas

Making waves

Is forced displacement acceptable in conservation projects?

Learning to learn

Protecting nature, culture and people

Agriculture vs protected areas

Tourism in Nepal

Governance of protected areas

Useful web links

PDF version

Send us your comments on this issue

id21 Home

id21 Society & Economy

id21 Health

id21 Urban Poverty

id21 Education

About id21

Links

Contact id21

Site map

Tourism in Nepal

Tourism in the Greater Himalaya supports the local economy with foreign exchange and by creating opportunities for local employment. Mass and unregulated tourism, however, can cause environmental damage, particularly in ecologically fragile areas. Is ecotourism - responsible travel that aims to conserve the environment and improve local people's welfare - an effective compromise?

Conservation in Annapurna

The Greater Himalaya is a critical ecosystem, one of 34 biodiversity 'hotspots' worldwide. About 11 percent of the region is managed as protected areas. The Annapurna Conservation Area Project (ACAP), established in 1986, is the first and largest conservation area in Nepal.
Before ACAP, trekkers exploited local forests for firewood and left behind huge amounts of rubbish. The average trekker spent US$3 a day, 20 percent of which reached local people. Since the ACAP began, satellite mapping shows a dramatic increase in forest cover and cleaner trails. The study also revealed that, over time, about 50 percent of tourist revenue stays in the local economy.

Annapurna is a good model as local people have strong decision-making powers based on negotiation and are testing management solutions. Success factors include:

  • Tourist money is going directly into the local economy as tourists spend money on lodging, porters and food.
  • A revitalised local craft industry and the potential for farmers to grow food for tourists.
  • Tourism revenues benefit local health and education - to repair and construct schools and health clinics and to promote sanitation through the construction of pit latrines and rubbish pits.
  • Local people are undertaking management activities through conservation area management committees that work with political organisations to improve environmental protection and train local workers.
  • Alternative energy sources and fuel-efficient technologies in some tourist areas are minimising the need to cut trees for firewood, reducing deforestation.
  • Walking trails, information posts and Conservation Education Centres encourage tourists to be aware of and reduce the effects they have on the environment.

A word of warning

Often located in remote and inaccessible areas, ecotourism has clearly benefited people as an alternative income source. However, the benefits and overall potential of ecotourism are sometimes overstated. Successful projects are rare and efforts to replicate them limited. In some places ecotourism is damaging rather than protecting fragile areas, as it opens up previously fragile destinations to tourism.

How much impact is acceptable?

Too many visitors may damage protected areas, leading to degraded surroundings and a decline in tourism, leaving local people without an income source. Other ecotourism ventures such as trekking in Bhutan and watching mountain gorillas in Rwanda and Uganda are solving this problem by limiting visitor numbers and introducing high tourist fees.

While ecotourism in Nepal is currently accessible for many, the number of visitors may cause problems in the future. Making ecotourism practical and sustainable is a challenge for tourism entrepreneurs and protected area managers.

Nakul Chettri, Eklabya Sharma, Kamal Banskota
International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development
GPO Box 3226
Khumaltar
Kathmandu
Nepal
T +977 1 552 5313
F +977 1 552 4509
nchettri@icimod.org.np
www.icimod.org

See also

Ecotourism and Biodiversity Conservation, by N. Chettri, ICIMOD Newsletter 45: 17-19, 2004
www.icimod.org/downloads/nls/45.pdf

Ecotourism and Conservation: Hand in Hand in the Annapurna Region of Nepal, by P. C. Gurung, Tigerpaper 25 (2):19-23, 1998

Annapurna Conservation Area Operational Plan, by M. N. Sherpa, B. Coburn and C. P. Gurung, KMTNC, Kathmandu, 1996

FREE Information Delivery services from id21:

Get updates by email: ID21 news

id21 is enabled by the UK Government Department for International Development and hosted by the Institute of Development Studies, at the University of Sussex, UK. Charitable Company No. 877338. id21 is a oneworld.net partner and a mediachannel affiliate

Right-to-Reply:
Comment on any of the issues raised in this Insights.
Read what others have said.

Top of the page

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) any article may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided both source (id21, insights) and authors are properly acknowledged and informed. Copyright © 2004 id21. All rights reserved.