|
|
|
March 2002 Insights Issue
#40
Back
to Insights #40
A foreign affair?
How far does Africa need foreign banks?
Free foreign bank entry is essential to financial liberalisation in
Africa. It is also integral to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) protocols
on the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) embraced by most
African governments. What are the pros and cons of free foreign bank entry?
What are the implications for local domestic banks?
Foreign banks are central to the evolution of African banking. In colonial
times, formal banks were foreign. Post-independence in the 1960s saw the
creation of a two-tier banking system, with a central bank responsible
for monetary policy, and several commercial banks handling deposits and
loans. The lending objectives of foreign banks, however, severely marginalised
indigenous entrepreneurs. Some governments intervened by nationalising
foreign banks - most are now insolvent and either privatised or sold to
foreign owners.
Recent research by the Birmingham Business School and the Institute for
Development Policy and Management examined how open 26 African economies
are to foreign participation in their domestic banking markets. Key findings
include:
- Foreign banks can be totally involved in smaller economies such as
Lesotho and Swaziland. A small domestic market means that locally-owned
banks cannot recover high set-up costs as foreign banks can from profitable
operations elsewhere.
- Financial liberalisation increases the degree of access by foreign
banks. Foreign banks in Tanzania had only 5 percent access pre-1980
when policies were restrictive. This figure has now risen to 76 percent.
So too the trend in Ethiopia (at 2 percent because of its barriers to
entry under a Marxist regime) is now expected to change.
- Although bank loan growth patterns are similar for both domestic and
foreign banks, increased foreign participation reduces the variability
of loan supply.
- Contrary to expectation, foreign and domestic banks both shoulder
a considerable amount of non-performing loans, possibly due to differences
in accounting practices.
- Foreign banks are more profitable but not necessarily better capitalised
than their local counterparts.
Mixed blessings? The pros and cons of foreign bank entry
Foreign banks directly improve the quality, pricing and availability
of financial services. They engender competition with domestic banks and
improve financial system architecture, for example, accounting, auditing,
transparency, and risk management. Foreign banks also increase competitiveness
and efficiency leading to better quality customer services.
However, foreign banks can destabilise domestic bank credit by providing
additional channels for capital flight. Foreign-owned banks also tend
to withdraw quickly from the domestic market in the face of financial
crisis, as was the case in South East Asia. In addition, foreign banks
use their financial power to cherry pick the most lucrative transactions,
thus relegating domestic banks to more risky markets.
How should African governments respond?
- Where there is too much foreign bank involvement, local private banks
should be encouraged to merge and expand to become more viable.
- Policy makers should not be complacent regarding the liquidity and
capitalisation of foreign banks, even if the banks fall under the jurisdiction
of the parent country. Both domestic and foreign banks should be subjected
to the same regulatory regime, and the level of monitoring should be
equally strict.
- By designing policies that enhance foreign bank participation for
example setting up new banks or privatising state-owned banks.
- Sequencing is crucial. It is important to strengthen and enhance
the international competitiveness of the domestic banking system before
opening up fully to foreign entry.
Victor Murinde
Birmingham Business School
University of Birmingham
Edgbaston
Birmingham B15 2TT
UK
T +44 (0)121 414 6704
V.Murinde@bham.ac.uk
Victor.Murinde@man.ac.uk
Moses Tefula
Institute for Development Policy and Management
University of Manchester
Oxford Road
Manchester M13 9GH
UK
T +44 (0)161 275 2827
Moses.Tefula@man.ac.uk
http://idpm.man.ac.uk/idpm/idpm_dp.htm#F_DWP
|
|
| FREE Information
Delivery services from ID21: |
 |
|
ID21 is enabled by the UK Government
Department for International Development(www.dfid.gov.uk) and hosted by the Institute
of Development Studies (www.ids.ac.uk/ids), at the University of Sussex,
UK. Charitable Company No. 877338. ID21 is a oneworld.net
(www.oneworld.org) partner and a mediachannel
affiliate (www.mediachannel.org).
|
|
Right-to-Reply:
Comment on any
of the issues raised in this Insights.
Read what others
have said.
|
|