Go to the ID21 home page

Insights
id21 logo ID21 Home
id21 logo Insights
id21 logo Issue #36
Richer or poorer? Achievements and challenges of ethical trade
Who benefits in South Africa?
-
Consensus or conflict: what's in a code?
SA8000: can standards evolve?
-
Code compliance in Zimbabwe
Death by a thousand codes?
Fresh off the shelf: gender and horticulture
Learning by doing: the ETI way
Are women garment workers stitched up?
Other articles
Sites for sore eyes
- - -

March 2001 Insights Issue #36

Back to Insights #36

Stitched up
Can codes help women garment workers?

The garments sector is a major source of female employment: 75 percent of jobs in the industry are held by women and yet theirs are the lowest paid and lowest status of all. Production is highly globalised and characterised by continual waves of relocation, a trend that shows no signs of abating.

In this highly competitive sector, companies seek ever more flexible and cost effective production systems. International subcontracting chains - 'chains of subordination' - are dominated by big retail stores and brand names. Women carry a disproportionate burden of risk and cost at the production end of the chain in low wages and short term, unstable patterns of employment.

Women work in Export Processing Zones, but also in sweatshops and home based production within the informal sector in developing and industrialised countries: in Australia it is estimated that for every factory-based worker there are 15 outworkers. Indeed the detrimental effect on working conditions that the need for greater flexibility in garments production has encouraged is highlighted by a recent ILO report.

Garments retailers, for a decade the target of high profile consumer action, now mostly accept responsibility for labour conditions along their supply chains. Much garment production in the informal sector, however, lies beyond the reach of labour laws and unions, let alone Codes of Practice. Further research is needed to answer the following questions:

  • Will codes achieve real improvement, given the essentially competitive nature of international subcontracting systems?

  • Can codes that include labour rights be genuinely implemented along supply chains?

  • How can the negative aspects of gender bias inherent in subcontracting chains be overcome?

Or is it enough that the labour rights agenda at the centre of codes provides a space for labour activists, whether inside or outside formal trade union structures, to build campaigns and connections along global production systems?

Linda Shaw
Women Working Worldwide
Room 412 Manton Building
Rosamond Street West
Manchester M15 6LL
UK
Linda.M.Shaw@man.ac.uk
 

See also
Labour Practices in the footwear, leather, textiles and clothing industries, ILO, Geneva (2000)
Organising Along International Subcontracting Chains, WWW, Manchester forthcoming (2001)

FREE Information Delivery services from ID21:
Get updates by email: ID21 news
ID21 is enabled by the UK Government Department for International Development(www.dfid.gov.uk) and hosted by the Institute of Development Studies (www.ids.ac.uk/ids), at the University of Sussex, UK. Charitable Company No. 877338. ID21 is a oneworld.net (www.oneworld.org) partner and a mediachannel affiliate (www.mediachannel.org).

Top of the page

Views expressed in INSIGHTS are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and
institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2005 id21. All rights reserved.