September 2000 Insights Issue #34Unequal access to social capital? Evidence from TanzaniaSocial capital, it is widely accepted, is beneficial to economic performance. How is social capital formed and how can it be measured? Why do different communities have different levels of social capital? Research at Bocconi University examined group formation - an important dimension of social capital relatively easy to measure - and asked: how does an individual join a group? If diversity within a community - such as degree of income inequality - influences individual incentives to join a group that may provide shared economic benefits, several questions arise. Does greater inequality lead to more or less group participation? As inequality deepens, who drops out - the poorer or the richer members? Is the drop out rate linked to rules of access? Does inequality affect group performance, and therefore access to social capital? Economic theory predicts that group participation should be affected if there is an increase in inequality. The size of the group depends on members' perception of the gap between the costs and benefits of joining. What happens if the richer members become richer and the poorer members poorer? As long as group size and composition remain unchanged, after the increase in inequality the rich could be liable for higher fees and may decide to drop out. Inequality affecting group size also depends on rules of access. If the richer members impose an exclusion rule to restrict participation to their own kind, this might prevent people from dropping out as inequality increases, but will affect the dynamics of the group to the disadvantage of poorer members. These predictions were tested using survey data collected from rural households in Tanzania in 1995 and produced the following results:
An important dimension of social capital is group performance, in addition to size and formation. Empirical analysis on the same data shows that greater inequality leads to poor group dynamics, for example:
Redistributive policies aimed at reducing income inequality may well have the beneficial side effect of building and strengthening social capital. Contributor(s): Eliana La Ferrara Further information: See also: Other related links: |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Views expressed in INSIGHTS are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged. Copyright © 2005 id21. All rights reserved.
|
|||||||