September 2000 Insights Issue #34Choosing better technology - does social capital help?How do rural communities make important decisions about farming techniques? What determines, for example, whether neighbouring households share information and decide to adopt a new technology or not? 'Social assessments' can enhance understanding of such social processes; but at a cost of around US$100,000, are they worth it? At Middlebury College in the United States, analysis of household data from Tanzania suggests that the positive effect of social capital on fertiliser adoption makes a strong case for using social assessments to improve the probability that agricultural households will adopt new technologies. Technology adoption can dramatically improve the welfare of neighbouring agricultural households in Sub-Saharan Africa. Are ethnically and socially homogeneous households, who communicate often, more likely to share vital information and therefore adopt new technologies? Using data from 23 villages in the Plateau Zone of Tanzania, the analysis shows that:
To design successful extension programmes that encourage adoption of new technologies, social assessments can usefully:
This does not mean, however, that investing in extension programs in communities with high ethnic fragmentation should be avoided. Ethnically diverse communities may well be the poorest and in most need of improved agricultural techniques. Where investment is aimed at the poorest villages, support for social structures will be crucial, for example:
Contributor(s): Jonathan Isham Further information: See Also: Other related links: |
|
||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Views expressed in INSIGHTS are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged. Copyright © 2005 id21. All rights reserved.
|
|||||||