Go to the ID21 home page

Insights
id21 logo ID21 Home
id21 logo Insights
id21 logo Issue #31
For richer, for fairer- poverty reduction and income distribution
Efficiency versus equity? Wage waves in China
-
Seeds of hope? Is the Green Revolution coming for Africa?
Measuring pro-poor growth in rural India
Earnings off the farm: magic bullet or myth?
-
Ethiopia after reform: why some poor got poorer
Storm clouds over Asia: signs of a silver lining?
Sites for Sore Eyes
- - -

September 1999 Insights Issue #31

Back to Insights #31

Downsides to Ethiopia's upturn

In the past few decades Ethiopia has undergone dramatic changes, including major rural policy reforms launched in the late 1980s. Though interrupted by war and severe drought, these reforms have had a highly successful impact on the national economy, especially since the present government came to power in 1992. Yet at the village or microeconomic level, survey evidence paints a less uniformly rosy picture. Economists from the University of Oxford and Addis Ababa University have collaborated on a seven-year investigation into links between macroeconomic and rural policies, and into how welfare has evolved in rural Ethiopia. Findings suggest that many rural people are better-off for reform but some could have missed out entirely.

Overall, economic growth has accelerated by more than six percent a year in Ethiopia since 1992. Most of this growth has come from the non-agricultural sector. Nonetheless, growth in agricultural GDP is at three to four percent a year, still well above the population growth rate, currently estimated at 2.5 to 3.0 percent. Monetary stability, linked among other factors to a degree of fiscal prudence, has resulted in enviable price stability. For example, the impact on inflation of massive currency devaluation was negligible, inflation remaining in single digits.

While Ethiopia's macroeconomic evolution looks generally promising, experiences at the micro-level do not signal unmixed success. The Oxford and Addis Ababa researchers limited their studies to a selection of communities in rural Ethiopia where households and communities were interviewed in 1989 by the International Food Policy Research Institute as part of surveys probing the impact of the famine. From 1994, they re-interviewed the communities and households four times and further rounds are planned for the near future. A unique insight into village experiences over more than a decade is emerging.

Joint studies to date have focused on how and why poverty changes have evolved in these communities. A core finding was that, overall, poverty had declined quite strongly between 1989 and 1995 in all the communities under study. Producer prices had risen by an average 40 percent as a result of market reform and devaluation. Fertiliser and other inputs cost more but supplies and sales were up as well. Many households had taken on extra non-farm activities and numbers of people involved in petty and intermediate trading had risen.

Such consumption gains and signs of poverty reduction rest on increased returns to land and labour and on benefits of better rainfall. Much higher returns also came from living close to towns and from improvements in existing infrastructure. In short, returns to different forms of physical, human and infrastructural capital have increased considerably. These findings stood the test of several different measures of wellbeing and appear strongly to endorse the reform process. Yet the same data sources also indicate that although consumption and literacy have risen since 1992, this shift may only mark a return to pre-famine levels. Moreover:

  • At least one village showed signs of worsening consumption and livestock asset figures
  • Some people experienced a big decline in real consumption levels over the study period
  • Income inequality appears to have worsened in several of the communities under study.

Poverty in Ethiopia is essentially asset poverty. Returns to physical, human and infrastructural capital have increased but the poor mostly lack access to such capital. Even if new policies are not per se anti-poor, they cannot benefit one and all unless policymakers work to improve infrastructure and guarantee better access to physical and human capital for the poor.

Contributor(s): Stefan Dercon

Further information:
Stefan Dercon
Centre for the Study of African Economies
Institute of Economics and Statistics
University of Oxford
St. Cross Building
Manor Road
Oxford
OX1 3UL
UK

Tel: +44 (0)1865 271084
Fax: +44 (0)1865 281447
Email: stefan.dercon@economics.oxford.ac.uk
Institute of Economics and Statistics, University of Oxford

Other related links:
Search Eldis for sources on Agriculture

FREE Information Delivery services from ID21:
Get updates by email: ID21 news
ID21 is enabled by the UK Government Department for International Development(www.dfid.gov.uk) and hosted by the Institute of Development Studies (www.ids.ac.uk/ids), at the University of Sussex, UK. Charitable Company No. 877338. ID21 is a oneworld.net (www.oneworld.org) partner and a mediachannel affiliate (www.mediachannel.org).

Top of the page

Views expressed in INSIGHTS are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and
institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2005 id21. All rights reserved.