Go to the ID21 home page

Insights
id21 logo ID21 Home
id21 logo Insights
id21 logo Issue #31
For richer, for fairer- poverty reduction and income distribution
Efficiency versus equity? Wage waves in China
-
Seeds of hope? Is the Green Revolution coming for Africa?
Measuring pro-poor growth in rural India
Earnings off the farm: magic bullet or myth?
-
Ethiopia after reform: why some poor got poorer
Storm clouds over Asia: signs of a silver lining?
Sites for Sore Eyes
- - -

September 1999 Insights Issue #31

Back to Insights #31

Efficiency versus equity?

The rise and rise of wage inequality in China

National surveys between 1988 and 1995 indicated that changes in China's urban wage structure were associated with growing inequality. Researchers at the Institute of Economics and Statistics, Oxford, modelled contrasting explanations for such a shift. Did it represent movement of the labour market towards equilibrium and away from extreme disequilibrium? Or did it reflect a move from one state of equilibrium to another that was inherently more unequal? In either case, could the new situation be justified in terms of extra incentives or efficiency, despite the increase in inequality?

The study verified that wage inequality did increase in China over the seven years in question. The Gini coefficient (see box, previous spread) rose from the low value of 0.229 in 1988 to 0.307 in 1995. More to the point, analysis based on a simulated model of actual earnings and employment data and their potential interplay with other factors suggested that:

  • wages for some types of unskilled worker fell relative to others, a sign of rising abour market competition.
  • rewards for education and skill-based occupations (or returns on human capital) increased at the same time, consistent with improving incentives and efficiency
  • examination of wages in relation to worker ages showed greater rises for those in id-range, implying closer linkages between rewards and productivity.

Other apparent changes were harder to explain or justify in terms of greater efficiency. There was a sharp apparent increase in discrimination in the labour market. It became more of a disadvantage to be female, to belong to a minority group or to be a transient urban-rural migrant. By contrast, belonging to the Communist Party conferred a bigger advantage. Liberal enterprise reforms have evidently made it easier for employers in China to discriminate more on such non-economic grounds.

There was a rise in the relative wage advantage of employees in state-owned enterprises and institutions, especially by comparison with the local private sector. Such sharp segmentation suggests that large areas of the urban economy remained immune to labour market forces. Moreover, the spatial dispersion of wages increased considerably. Wage segmentation by province was only partially offset by labour mobility. Potential policy lessons were that:

  • Some of the new inequalities in China's labour and wages market appear justifiable in terms of greater incentives or efficiency but other emerging biases are harder to justify.
  • Further development of a modern urban labour market in China is needed to counter these new inefficiencies.

Contributor(s): John Knight

Further information:
John Knight
Institute of Economics and Statistics
University of Oxford
St. Cross Building
Manor Road
Oxford
OX1 3UL
UK

Tel: +44 (0)1865 271069
Fax: +44 (0)1865 271094
Email: john.knight@economics.ox.ac.uk
Institute of Economics and Statistics, University of Oxford

Other related links:
Search Eldis for sources on China.
FREE Information Delivery services from ID21:
Get updates by email: ID21 news
ID21 is enabled by the UK Government Department for International Development(www.dfid.gov.uk) and hosted by the Institute of Development Studies (www.ids.ac.uk/ids), at the University of Sussex, UK. Charitable Company No. 877338. ID21 is a oneworld.net (www.oneworld.org) partner and a mediachannel affiliate (www.mediachannel.org).

Top of the page

Views expressed in INSIGHTS are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and
institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2005 id21. All rights reserved.