March 1999 Insights Issue #29Gender gap in India's schoolsIs the labour market a factor?Like any investment, investments in the education of girls and boys can be judged in terms of relative rates of return. By this yardstick, economic incentives to acquire schooling in India are lower for girls than for boys. But must this statistic weaken the case for promoting education for girls? A University of Oxford study probed these issues. The research findings suggest that campaigns to boost perceptions of the value of women's education and policy changes to curb job and wage discrimination against women in the labour market could help counter this imbalance. People do not pursue education for its intrinsic worth alone but also for its potential to boost the earning and job prospects of individuals. If the labour market discriminates by rewarding women's education less well than men's education, the expected economic rate of return from educating girls will be lower than that from educating boys. Under such circumstances, even otherwise liberal-minded parents are likely to support education for daughters less than for sons. Do these results imply that in India there is a weaker efficiency case for promoting education for girls? Not so, considering these estimates measure only private returns to education. Education of girls brings well-known social benefits such as reduced infant mortality and lower birth-rate. Though not quantified these dividends are thought to be substantial. Even so, the decision to enrol and retain a child in school is still essentially a parental decision in countries where primary education is not yet compulsory. In other words, the respective social benefits of schooling for girls vs. boys are not taken into account by parents when making decisions about the education of sons and daughters, whereas private returns are. Would parents provide equal amounts of education to girls and boys if the expected private rate of return to girls' schooling was equal to or greater than that expected from boys' schooling? Societal norms such as early marriage and the dowry system would still militate against girls' education in South Asia. Moreover, in this and many other developing regions, where social security and state pensions are not generally provided, a male child will still give support to parents in their old age. But any benefits of educating females will be reaped by their in-laws. Such asymmetry in economic incentives for parents is probably a key barrier to equal treatment of sons and daughters, and it would be so even if returns from education for girls vis-à-vis boys were evenly matched. In terms of lessons for policymakers, these observations suggest there may be call for:
Contributor(s): Geeta Gandhi Kingdon Further information: |
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
||||||||