![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
|
Filling the gapsIntroducing substitute health workers in AfricaMassive shortages in trained health care professionals in sub-Saharan Africa have led to an examination of substitute health workers as an immediate response to the workforce crisis.
For many countries these substitute health workers (SHWs) are not new. They already play various minor roles in health services, especially in rural and deprived areas. In Tanzania, Malawi and Mozambique, assistant medical officers are used as substitutes for doctors. They perform surgery and a variety of other tasks. Ghana uses community health officers to improve access to health care and Ethiopia is planning large numbers of health extension workers. Resistance from the health professions, such as doctors and midwives, to retain their status limits the numbers of SHWs trained and the roles that they are assigned. In the 1980s and 1990s many countries in sub-Saharan Africa, led by the professions, banned the training of enrolled nurses which restricted the numbers available. Given the shortage of personnel available to respond to priorities such as antiretroviral treatment, the World Health Organisation estimates that sub-Saharan Africa urgently needs up to one million more health workers to be able to meet the health Millennium Development Goals. This urgency suggests that substitutes have a critical role to play. SHWs are trained for specific roles, may not be internationally tradable and are more easily retained within the country. Other possible advantages of SHWs are:
However, there may be disadvantages to SHWs:
Given the rising emigration of health workers, the use of SHWs should be sustained and planned to fit a country’s health workforce needs. SHWs should be allowed to progress, acquire more advanced skills, be entrusted with more complicated tasks, and eventually even qualify as health care professionals. Delanyo Dovlo See also Using mid-level cadres as substitutes for internationally mobile health professionals in Africa. A desk review, Human Resources for Health 2(7), by D. Dovlo, 2004
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) any article may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided both source (id21, insights) and authors are properly acknowledged and informed. Copyright © 2004 id21. All rights reserved. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||