|
|
 |
Public sector doctors
with second jobs
It is common for doctors working in the public sector to hold second
jobs in private practice. Dual medical practice occurs in virtually all
countries regardless of income.
Dual medical practice is potentially a serious problem in low and middle-income
countries because such activity can create inappropriate incentives for
behaviour:
- It can encourage the misappropriation of scarce public sector
resources into the private sector by doctors engaging in this activity.
- It can also lead to doctors diverting patients from public facilities
into higher cost private services. This could then make it difficult
for the poorest and most vulnerable sections of the population
to afford healthcare.
The Health Economics and Financing Programme at the London School of
Hygiene and Tropical Medicine is currently involved in studies of dual
medical practice in four countries China, Thailand, Peru and Zimbabwe.
These studies focus on the motivation for dual medical practice, the
regulations that govern it (or indeed, in some settings, the lack of
such regulations) and the impact it has on public sector services.
The evidence was gathered mainly through interviews with doctors, hospital
managers and policy-makers.
Research findings so far include:
- Dual job holding is widely practiced and acknowledged. This occurs
even in settings where there are major regulatory restrictions,
such as China. In China regulations are often not followed because
changes
in economic and political conditions, such as economic liberalisation
and entry into the World Trade Organisation, have caused them to
become outdated. These changes have encouraged private (largely foreign)
investment
in medical facilities, which have opened up important income generating
opportunities for medical practitioners. This has increased their
bargaining power and income expectations, and has made it virtually
impossible
for hospital managers to restrict such activity.
- Dual practice is an important source of income for many doctors
although in some cases, non-financial rewards such as training opportunities
are also important. For example, in China, private hospitals are
often
equipped
with the latest medical technology not available in the public
sector.
- The reason why doctors maintain their public sector jobs despite
good income opportunities in private practice is that it provides
stable income,
training opportunities and sometimes other benefits such as a pension.
- Dual practice allows the public sector to maintain skilled staff
and to minimise its financial burden. This is because it allows public
sector
doctors to generate income through private work without drawing
on the limited funds in the public sector.
- Dual practice allows doctors to provide services outside normal
working hours and possibly in areas where public services are difficult
to
access such as rural districts. This is because, as a private practitioner,
a doctor has the financial incentive to provide services where
there is obvious demand.
Key policy implications are that:
- dual practice can be seen as a possible policy solution to the
problem of maintaining medical staff and inadequate public sector resources.
It can minimise the financial burden on the public sector to pay
doctors
the incomes they might normally expect
- in encouraging dual practice, there is a need to enforce clear
guidelines and mechanisms that will prevent misuse of public sector
resources
- it is possible that dual practice can increase rather than reduce
access to services for the poorest groups. In some cases services
provided this
way may be cheaper and are provided outside the hours and the areas
that public services are normally available.
Stephen Jan
Health Economics & Financing Programme
Health Policy Unit
London
School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Keppel St
London WC1E 7HT
UK
T + 44 (0)207 927 2262
F +44 (0)207 637 5391
stephen.jan@lshtm.ac.uk
|
|
|
FREE Information Delivery services from ID21:
|
|
Right-to-Reply:
Comment on any of the
issues raised in this Insights.
Read what others
have said.
|
|
|
|
Views expressed
on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing
institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless
stated otherwise) articles may be copied or quoted without restriction,
provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.
Copyright © 2005 id21. All rights reserved.
|
|
|