|
|
|
March 2001 Insights Health Issue #1
Back to Insights Health #1
Taking the strain
The challenge for health systems
While developing countries continue to battle against
infectious diseases, they now face an increasing burden from NCDs. How
can health systems deal with this additional strain?
Health sector reforms over the last decade have included
decentralisation, enhanced private sector involvement and alternative
forms of funding. However, reforms are often:
-
insensitive to local contexts
-
donor-driven
-
focused on health service efficiency rather than
wider health objectives
-
slowly or poorly implemented.
The latest WHO World Health Report promotes a health
systems approach to overcome these limitations. The UK Nuffield
Institute for Health is involved in programmes to strengthen health
systems in various countries and is co-ordinating research into the
strategic planning capacity of Health Ministries in Eritrea, Mozambique
and Zimbabwe. Previous exploratory research in seven countries
underlines the significance of the broader policy processes of health
sector reform. Lessons learnt from these various activities suggest that
policy-makers need to consider several important issues.
.
Predicting epidemiological patterns
Gathering accurate health statistics is difficult.
Understandably, information systems tend to focus on communicable
diseases and may fail to capture the national picture. Basic weaknesses
in data from studies of the disease burden may limit their usefulness.
Fragmentation, privatisation and decentralisation of health systems also
complicate data collection.
Setting priorities
It is too simplistic to portray this as a choice between
communicable and non-communicable diseases. Priorities will include a
mix of both and will depend on the assessment methods used.
Cost-effectiveness analyses are influenced by the outcome measures
chosen. For example, composite indicators, such as Disability Adjusted
Life Years (DALYs), go beyond simple measures of mortality to include
disabling conditions.
Future funding
Few countries are likely to see a significant increase
in their national health budget. However, recovering costs through user
charges can affect equity of access to care. Chronic NCDs, such as
diabetes, pose particular problems for funding.
System boundaries
How feasible are interventions for NCDs? Previous
reforms have been criticised for focusing on services rather than wider
health issues. Long-term control of many NCDs requires preventative
activities outside the normal health ministry role. The WHO Tobacco Free
Initiative has highlighted the importance of extending boundaries beyond
individuals to wider socio-economic factors. Health promotion strategies
for NCDs will involve non-health service features such as environmental
factors, diet and stress-reduction. This extended role for health
systems will have consequences for policy development, advocacy and
resource allocation.
Private sector role
Competition-based reforms in the 1990s encouraged the
growth of the private health sector. Although these services are often
of poor quality and limited to urban areas, they have important
implications for the design of NCD interventions. Health planners must
address issues such as referral procedures, human resource development
and regulatory tools in the private sector. The tobacco, alcohol, food
and other industries will also require regulation.
Policy-making capacity
Experience has shown that Health Ministries may lack the
authority, skilled personnel, and structures and processes for strategic
policy-making. Recent reforms may even have weakened this capacity.
Policy-making processes could be strengthened by:
-
developing wider policy-making and implementation
tools for prioritisation, resource allocation, regulation and
capacity assessment
-
developing and supplying a wide range of skills to
policy-makers, ranging from epidemiology through economics to
political science
-
assessing the implications of new strategies, using
techniques such as stakeholder analysis and political mapping
-
employing the knowledge and alternative perspectives
of NCD specialists
-
incorporating broader input from stakeholders, such
as representatives of NGOs, other sectors and professional groups,
to ensure that new policies are well-grounded.
Andrew Green and Charles Collins
Nuffield Institute for Health
University of Leeds
71-75 Clarendon Rd
Leeds
LS2 9PL
UK
T: +44 (0)113 233 6953
F: +44 (0)113 246 0899
a.t.green@leeds.ac.uk
c.d.collins@leeds.ac.uk
See also
Health sector reform and the interpretation of policy context,
Health Policy 47 by C. Collins, A. Green and D. Hunter (1999)
World Health Report 2000, WHO, Geneva (2000) |
|
| FREE Information Delivery services
from ID21: |
 |
| ID21 is enabled by the UK
Government Department for International Development(www.dfid.gov.uk) and hosted by
the Institute of Development Studies (www.ids.ac.uk/ids), at the
University of Sussex, UK. Charitable Company No. 877338. ID21 is a
oneworld.net (www.oneworld.org)
partner and a mediachannel affiliate (www.mediachannel.org). |
|