![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
|
|
Achieving equity and quality in South AfricaBuilding a post-apartheid higher education system in South Africa has to overcome old and new forms of inequity. Since 1994, enrolment rates for black students have risen to 60.8 percent of total enrolments in non-distance mode courses. Women students comprise 54.5 percent of all students in the higher education system. Yet their academic success and more representative distribution across subject areas remain a challenge. The sector needs to:
Yet better success rates without credible quality would be a hollow gain. The government has identified planning, funding and quality as the main elements necessary for positive change, for example:
The Higher Education Quality Committee of the Council on Higher Education, an independent statutory organisation, includes social transformation in its definition of quality and encourages universities to focus on the connection between equity and quality. Evaluation systems include race and gender equity within a broader notion of social transformation that focuses on curriculum reform, changes in institutional culture, and innovative scholarship. Not all universities have the resources to achieve new approaches to equity with quality. This could set up new forms of inequity as only some institutions can respond effectively to new social and educational priorities. Therefore, the agency runs a continuing programme of training workshops which includes staff from all institutions in the country. It is too early to know whether the policy commitment and actions to connect equity with quality are having the intended effect. The equity and quality link is focused on institutional agendas but higher quality teaching and research have yet to be achieved across all institutions. However, a start has been made. Mala Singh See also The Higher Education Quality Committee of the Council on Higher Education National Plan for Higher Education, Ministry of Education, South Africa, February 2001 (PDF) Higher Education Monitor: A Case for Improving Teaching and Learning in South African Higher Education, HE Monitor 6, Council on Higher Education: Pretoria, by Ian Scott, Nan Yeld and Jane Hendry, 2007 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) any article may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided both source (id21, insights) and authors are properly acknowledged and informed. Copyright © 2006 id21. All rights reserved. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||