Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Health
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Health
  Health systems
and economics
  Non-communicable
diseases
  Infectious
diseases
  HIV/AIDS
  Sexual and
reproductive health
  Maternal health
  Child health
  Environmental
health
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Freedom to grow: are children bigger in South Africa’s new democracy?

Human growth is a sensitive measure of social change. South Africa has seen huge political, economic and social changes in the last decade. Is this reflected in the growth of the nation’s children? Research from Loughborough University, UK, looks at data from more than 3000 children born in Soweto and Johannesburg in 1990.

Under apartheid, there was a gradation of health and wellbeing from the prosperous whites to the impoverished blacks. Rural children were shorter and lighter than their urban peers and white children were taller and heavier than non-whites. Until transition, economic, health and education systems were heavily weighted in favour of whites and patterns of illness, death, growth and development within and between ethnic groups reflected these disparities. At the same time, the looming HIV pandemic threatened expectations of improved health, particularly amongst the black population. This research looks at the effect of post-apartheid economic and social changes on the growth and development of urban children.

Most (79 %) of the children in the study are black, 12 % are coloured and a few are white (6 %) or Indian (3 %). The research revealed that:

  • The children’s birth weights show a gradation with white children being the heaviest at 3223 g, followed by black (3079 g), coloured (3023 g) and Indian children (2895 g).
  • Surprisingly, differences in height and weight between whites and non-whites increased over time following transition.
  • The growth of white children continues to be superior to that of their non-white peers and differences that existed at birth and during infancy have not diminished during childhood and early adolescence.
  • Nearly one in five of the children in this study are stunted – a sign of persistent poor health and nutrition during infancy.

Recent research has linked stunting in childhood with obesity in older life, due to the phenomenon of ‘catch-up growth’. This in turn increases susceptibility to type II diabetes. South African children who are born small and then grow quickly have an increased risk of obesity and risk factors for diabetes. This is also related to urbanisation and the switch from a traditional low fat, high fibre diet and active lifestyle to a high fat, low fibre, high energy diet and sedentary lifestyle.

Laws that were introduced in the early 1990s to improve the quality of life of the previously disadvantaged, including free health care for all children under five years old, appear to have had little or no effect on the growth status of these children. The researcher points out that whilst political changes have been rapid since the end of apartheid, economic and social changes have been more gradual. These results show the need to ensure that positive changes at national and community level also have an effect on the individual child.

Source(s):
‘Physical growth in a transitional economy: the aftermath of South African apartheid’, Economics and Human Biology 1:29-42, by N. Cameron, 2003

Funded by: South African Medical Research Council, Anglo-American Children’s Fund, University of the Witwatersrand

id21 Research Highlight: 12 October 2004

Further Information:
Noël Cameron
Department of Human Sciences
Loughborough University
Loughborough
Leicestershire
LE11 3TU
UK

Tel: +44 (0)1509 223008
Fax: +44 (0)1509 223940
Contact the contributor: n.cameron@lboro.ac.uk

Loughborough University, UK

Other related links:
'Improving family nutrition'

'Halving child malnutrition by 2020: is income growth the answer?'

'Hitting the mark: can under five mortality be cut by two thirds?'

See id21's collection of links relevant to maternal and child health.

See id21's collection of links relevant to NCDs and disability.

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 1st September 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the Loughborough University, UK site.