Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Health
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Health
  Health systems
and economics
  Non-communicable
diseases
  Infectious
diseases
  HIV/AIDS
  Sexual and
reproductive health
  Maternal health
  Child health
  Environmental
health
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
New oral treatment proves effective against early syphilis in Tanzania

The recommended treatment for early syphilis is a single injection of penicillin G benzathine. Although easy for patients to adhere to, disadvantages include pain, possible penicillin allergy and the risk of HIV transmission from re-used needles. The lack of injection equipment and appropriately trained staff may also be a problem in settings with limited resources.

Previous studies in the United States have suggested that a drug called azithromycin, taken orally, could be an effective alternative to penicillin G benzathine for treating and preventing early syphilis. However, there was evidence that some high-risk groups became resistant to the drug over time. A research team led by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine carried out a trial to evaluate the efficacy of both treatments.

The trial, which took place in Mbeya, Tanzania, involved 328 participants with either primary or latent (undeveloped) syphilis, recruited through screening high-risk groups such as female bar workers. More than 50 percent of the participants were HIV-positive. Chosen at random, half received 2 grams of azithromycin orally, and the other half 2.4 million units (MU) of injected penicillin G benzathine.

The researchers assessed all the participants every three months over a period of nine months. They found that initial cure rates were the same for both groups and remained similar during the follow-up period. After this period, they tested 65 bar workers again. Results showed that:

  • Side effects of azithromycin were mild to moderate, involving minor stomach cramps, and were no worse with the 2 grams dose than with the lower dose used in previous studies.
  • After three months, cure rates were approximately 59.5 percent for both groups.
  • After six months, they were 85.5 percent for the azithromycin group and 81.5 percent for the penicillin G benzathine group.
  • Overall treatment efficacy was 97.7 percent for azithromycin and 95 percent for penicillin G benzathine.
  • Up to nine months, there was little difference in cure rate between HIV-positive participants and those without the virus.
  • After this period, eight of the 65 bar workers tested had relapsed; all were HIV-positive and at high risk of being re-infected with syphilis.

The study argues from these findings that a single 2 grams dose of azithromycin is as effective as a 2.4 MU injection of penicillin G benzathine, the standard treatment for early syphilis. Since it is taken orally, azithromycin is particularly useful in settings with limited resources where there is a lack of equipment and trained staff. The authors conclude that:

  • azithromycin can be regarded as an alternative to penicillin G benzathine and should be used more widely in syphilis control programmes, particularly in developing countries
  • there should be long-term follow-up of lower risk groups where re-infection is less likely, in order to measure relapse rates more accurately
  • continued monitoring of azithromycin resistance among high-risk and lower risk groups is of paramount importance.

Source(s):
'Single-Dose Azithromycin versus Penicillin G  Benzathine for the Treatment of Early Syphilis', New England Journal of Medicine 353: 1236-1244, by Gabriele Riedner, Jim Todd, David Mabey, Richard Hayes, Mary Rusizoka, Donan Mmbando, Leonard Maboko, Michael Hoelscher, Eleuter Samky, Eligius Lyamuya and Heiner Grosskurth, 2005 

Funded by: Wellcome Trust Research Training Fellowship, European Commission

id21 Research Highlight: 15 May 2007

Further Information:
Gabriele Riedner
WHO Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office
Adul Razzak Al-Sanhouri St.
P.O. Box 7068
Nasr City
Cairo 11371
Egypt

Contact the contributor: riednerg@emro.who.int

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), UK

Other related links:
'Implementing and sustaining antenatal syphilis control programmes'

'Is antenatal syphilis screening still cost effective in sub-Saharan Africa?'

'Screen test: detecting and treating syphilis in pregnant women in Tanzania'

'One step at a time - estimating STI cure rates'

'Altogether now? HIV prevention by mass treatment of sexually-transmitted infections'

Wiikipedia: Syphilis

WHO TDR Disease Watch: Syphilis

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 28th April 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21


id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development www.dfid.gov.uk
id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies www.ids.ac.uk at the University of Sussex www.sussex.ac.uk
IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of
www.mediachannel.org

 

 

Go to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (LSHTM), UK site.