Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Health
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Health
  Health systems
and economics
  Non-communicable
diseases
  Infectious
diseases
  HIV/AIDS
  Sexual and
reproductive health
  Maternal health
  Child health
  Environmental
health
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Meeting sexual and reproductive health needs in post-conflict settings

Governments and donors are increasingly contracting non-governmental organisations to provide a basic package of health services in post-conflict situations. In Afghanistan and South Sudan, this is now the principal way to deliver primary care services. This contracting approach could significantly scale up the provision of sexual and reproductive health services in post-conflict settings, but challenges remain.

A paper in the journal Reproductive Health Matters asks if the basic package of health services (BPHS) approach can adequately address sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in post-conflict settings. The need for health services in post-conflict countries often far exceeds the capacity to provide them, and packaging them into service contracts may be a way to rapidly expand delivery.

The content of the BPHS reflects a country’s needs and the cost-effectiveness of health services and is delivered through health posts, health centres and district hospitals. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) bid for service contracts. The government and international donors review bids, evaluate NGO performance and set national standards. Packages commonly include services related to maternal and newborn health, reproductive health, child health and immunisation, communicable diseases and nutrition.

In theory, the BPHS approach increases the effectiveness and efficiency of health service delivery by strengthening a coordinated nationwide system. NGOs often have experience and capacity and can respond more rapidly and effectively than weak government agencies. The bidding process and focus on results promotes accountability and quality. However, there are doubts about the nature of the cost-effectiveness, the true competitiveness of the contracting process and the impact of NGO dominance on government capacity.

The following factors could affect efforts to expand SRH services when using the BPHS approach:

  • Decision makers may overlook less tangible benefits to overall health and wellbeing from SRH services due to the focus on cost-effectiveness.
  • The bidding process encourages NGOs to cut costs, potentially at the expense of certain, less tangible SRH services.
  • Conservative political, religious and cultural forces may threaten provision of family planning and services to address unsafe abortion, especially if faith-based NGOs win contracts.
  • General health NGOs may not have the ability to deliver SRH services to international standards, but funding for specialised NGOs may be limited under the BPHS approach.
  • NGOs may feel unable to criticise governments and donors with whom they have or would like to have contracts under the BPHS approach.

The researchers conclude that governments and donors applying the BPHS contracting approach in post-conflict countries should:

  • ensure the full range of comprehensive reproductive health services and activities are provided, particularly those currently omitted in BPHS approaches such as sexual and gender-based violence, and SRH services for young people
  • monitor contracts and services closely to ensure the full range of SRH services is provided
  • ensure NGOs have the skills and resources to deliver SRH services
  • support advocacy activities on reproductive rights.

Source(s):
‘A Basic Package of Health Services for Post-Conflict Countries: Implications for Sexual and Reproductive Health Services’, Reproductive Health Matters 16 (31), pages 57 to 64, by Bayard Roberts, Samantha Guy, Egbert Sondorp and Louise Lee-Jones, 2008

id21 Research Highlight: 6 October 2008

Further Information:
Bayard Roberts
Conflict and Health Programme
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Keppel Street
London WC1E 7HT, UK

Tel: +44 20 7927 2050
Fax: +44 20 7637 5391
Contact the contributor: bayard.roberts@lshtm.ac.uk

Conflict and Health Programme, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK

Other related links:
'NGOs take on health services in Afghanistan'

'Grim picture: improving the health service in Chad'

'Ten years on from Cairo: integrating policies on population, gender and development'

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development and is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies www.ids.ac.uk at the University of Sussex. IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338.

Copyright © 2009 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 8th June 2009
FREE Information Delivery services from id21
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the Conflict and Health Programme, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK site.