|
|
|||||||||||||||
Governments and donors are increasingly contracting non-governmental organisations to provide a basic package of health services in post-conflict situations. In Afghanistan and South Sudan, this is now the principal way to deliver primary care services. This contracting approach could significantly scale up the provision of sexual and reproductive health services in post-conflict settings, but challenges remain. A paper in the journal Reproductive Health Matters asks if the basic package of health services (BPHS) approach can adequately address sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in post-conflict settings. The need for health services in post-conflict countries often far exceeds the capacity to provide them, and packaging them into service contracts may be a way to rapidly expand delivery. The content of the BPHS reflects a country’s needs and the cost-effectiveness of health services and is delivered through health posts, health centres and district hospitals. Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) bid for service contracts. The government and international donors review bids, evaluate NGO performance and set national standards. Packages commonly include services related to maternal and newborn health, reproductive health, child health and immunisation, communicable diseases and nutrition. In theory, the BPHS approach increases the effectiveness and efficiency of health service delivery by strengthening a coordinated nationwide system. NGOs often have experience and capacity and can respond more rapidly and effectively than weak government agencies. The bidding process and focus on results promotes accountability and quality. However, there are doubts about the nature of the cost-effectiveness, the true competitiveness of the contracting process and the impact of NGO dominance on government capacity. The following factors could affect efforts to expand SRH services when using the BPHS approach:
The researchers conclude that governments and donors applying the BPHS contracting approach in post-conflict countries should:
Source(s): id21 Research Highlight: 6 October 2008
Further Information: Tel:
+44 20 7927 2050 Conflict and Health Programme, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK Other related links:
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||