|
|
||||||||||||||||
Insecticide-treated bednets (ITNs) are widely promoted as a malaria prevention tool. The role and cost-effectiveness of indoor residual house spraying (IRS) for malaria control have received less attention. Research by the Kenya Medical Research Institute and other institutions found that IRS might be more effective and cheaper than ITNs in communities prone to epidemics of infection. In Kenya, nearly seven million people (23 percent of the population) live in the 15 highland districts at risk of malaria epidemics. The researchers investigated the cost-effectiveness of IRS and ITNs used in an emergency relief operation in an epidemic-prone area of western Kenya. They selected 590 homesteads: 200 with no mosquito control, 200 with IRS and 190 with ITNs. They found that:
The detection and containment of malaria epidemics in Africa have re-emerged as international priorities as part of the WHO's Roll Back Malaria campaign. However, recommendations to governments on best practice for early warning and detection systems or how to manage epidemics effectively are rarely based on empirical evidence. As a result, Health Ministries in the most affected countries face considerable problems in developing responses to the public health crises caused by malaria epidemics. This study shows that a single round of IRS is less than half as expensive as providing ITNs and three times more cost-effective in reducing malaria infection in western Kenya. The researchers conclude that IRS could play an important role in controlling malaria in often densely populated and economically important areas of Africa. Source(s): Funded by: The Wellcome Trust id21 Research Highlight: 10 June 2002
Further Information: Fax:
+254 2 711673 Kenya Medical Research Institute Other related links:
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||