Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Health
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Health
  Health systems
and economics
  Non-communicable
diseases
  Infectious
diseases
  HIV/AIDS
  Sexual and
reproductive health
  Maternal health
  Child health
  Environmental
health
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Zambia switches to artemisinin to treat childhood malaria

Incidence of childhood malaria is growing in Africa. This has coincided with increased resistance to first choice antimalarial drugs such as chloroquine.  In December 2002, Zambia became the first country to replace chloroquine with the artemisinin based combination therapy, artemether-lumefantrine for patients weighing 10 kilograms or more.

Artemisinin based combination therapy (ACT) is new and relatively expensive but has also proved highly effective in Africa. A research team led by the KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Collaborative Programme and Boston University, USA, evaluated treatment practices for uncomplicated malaria in Zambia following this change of drug policy.

The team conducted a survey of 944 children with uncomplicated malaria who attended 94 health facilities across four districts in Zambia: Chingola, an urban district with low or moderate rates of malaria infection; Kalomo, a semi-arid area with moderate rates of infection; Chipata, a mixed rural and urban district with moderate and high rates of infection; and Samfya, a rural, swampy area with high rates of malaria infection.

The study found that artemether-lumefantrine was not commonly used. Although programme activities such as in-service training and provision of job aids were implemented to some extent this did not seem to influence the prescribing of artemether-lumefantrine among children weighing 10 kilgrams or more. Results showed that:

  • Sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) was available at 100 percent of clinics, while chloroquine was available at 76 percent and artemether-lumefantrine at just 51 percent.
  • Out of all 944 children surveyed, only one child received chloroquine.
  • For children weighing less than 10 kilograms, health workers commonly prescribed SP in accordance with clinical guidelines.
  • Health workers prescribed artemether-lumefantrine to only 11 percent of the children weighing 10 kilograms or more, and SP to 68 percent.
  • At facilities where artemether-lumefantrine was available on the day of the survey, health workers prescribed it to only 22 percent of children weighing 10 kilograms or more.
  • In-service training on artemether-lumefantrine, presence of artemether-lumefantrine dosage wall charts, and possession of the guideline were not significantly associated with prescribing artemether-lumefantrine.
  • There was a significantly lower use of artemether-lumefantrine among children under two years.

The researchers conclude that Zambia has successfully discontinued the use of chloroquine for treating uncomplicated malaria. Health workers were also using SP appropriately for children weighing less than 10 kilograms. However, many clinics were not using artemether-lumefantrine appropriately. They conclude that:

  • Understanding possible misperceptions and concerns should be a high research priority for Zambia and other countries in the process of implementing ACT.
  • There is an urgent need for a sustainable supply of ACT across Africa, however, this must be accompanied by similar investments in programme activities to ensure the proper use of drugs at the point of care.

Source(s):
'Treatment of paediatric malaria during a period of drug transition to artemether-lumefantrine in Zambia: cross sectional study', British Medical Journal (BMJ) 331(7519), page 734, by Dejan Zurovac, Robert W. Snow, Mickey Ndhlovu, Alexander K. Rowe, Davidson H. Hamer and Donald M. Thea, 2005

Funded by: Zambian-Boston University Malaria Project; US Centres for Disease Control; Wellcome Trust, United Kingdom

id21 Research Highlight: 16 June 2006

Further Information:
Dejan Zurovac
Malaria Public Health and Epidemiology Group
Centre for Geographic Medicine
KEMRI/Wellcome Trust Collaborative Programme
PO Box 43640
00100 GPO
Nairobi
Kenya

Tel: +254 20 271 5160
Fax: +254 20 271 1673
Contact the contributor: dzurovac@wtnairobi.mimcom.net

Kenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Collaborative Programme

Boston University, USA

Other related links:
'Resistance to remedy: four malaria treatments tested in Tanzania'

'Spot the difference: efficacy versus effectiveness for anti-malarial drugs'

'Cheap and effective: new hope for treating drug-resistant malaria in Vietnam'

'Resisting the inevitable? Combining drugs to tackle malaria'

'Artemether-lumefantrine: is it effective for treating uncomplicated malaria?'

'Resisting change? Tackling drug-resistant malaria'

Roll Back Malaria Global Partnership

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 17th November 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the Kenya Medical Research Institute/Wellcome Trust Collaborative Programme site.

 

 

Go to http://www.kemri-wellcome.org/

 

 

Go to the Boston University, USA site.