Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Health
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Health
  Health systems
and economics
  Non-communicable
diseases
  Infectious
diseases
  HIV/AIDS
  Sexual and
reproductive health
  Maternal health
  Child health
  Environmental
health
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Swimming against the tide – health reform in South Africa and Zambia

The transition periods of the 1990s provided South Africa and Zambia with windows of opportunity to implement much-needed health financing reform. But is the end result of these reforms what was first envisaged? Researchers examined the political factors that have influenced the outcome of policy implementation in these two southern African countries.

The research carried out by the University of Witwatersrand, the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, the University of Cape Town and the University of Zambia investigated the process of health policy-making in South Africa and Zambia. The research asks why the implementation of health sector reform policies often produces unexpected results. The researchers conducted a policy analysis of health financing reform in South Africa and Zambia because – despite differences – both countries offered interesting cases of health reform after radical political change in the 1990s. 

Health policy reform was implemented in both countries during the 1990s. In Zambia and South Africa the results of the reforms were mixed. Both health systems experienced successes and failures. The research found that:

  • Rapid implementation of policy reform followed the political momentum of change. Administrative and political structures in the country changed almost as rapidly. The result was that many policies were rushed through without full planning and anticipation of the full range of their potential outcomes.
  • The enormous influence of individuals in the shape and nature of policies had a detrimental effect on the outcome of the introduction of those policies. In both countries, individuals (i.e. health ministers) had undue influence on health policy development.
  • In both South Africa and Zambia, government and non-governmental technical analysts designed health financing reform but had little real political power to implement their ideas.
  • These analysts designed policies that were politically difficult to implement as they created unequal, segmented and privatised health systems.
  • Policy-makers failed to anticipate some of the most important effects of the policies once implemented. The removal of user fees in South Africa resulted in the increased utilisation of health services but their perceived quality deteriorated. In Zambia, the introduction of fees undermined, at least initially, utilisation levels and increased inequalities.

So what are the lessons for strengthening future implementation of health reform? The report suggests that:

  • It is important to strengthen the links between government and non-governmental analysts so that existing knowledge can be better used.
  • The political awareness of analysts must be raised by ensuring they work with political decision-makers at the highest level.
  • The smooth implementation of policy can be achieved if analysts work with middle managers and front line health workers.
  • Political leaders must balance the political and technical considerations of policy reform.
  • Political leaders must create the adequate conditions for analysts to develop solutions that tackle the priority problems in the health system.
  •  

Source(s):
'The SAZA study: implementing health financing reform in South Africa and Zambia', Health Policy and Planning 18(1): 31-46, by L. Gilson et al, 2003

id21 Research Highlight: 19 May 2003

Further Information:
Lucy Gilson
Associate Professor
Centre for Health Policy
PO Box 1038
Johannesburg 2000
South Africa

Contact the contributor: lucyg@mail.saimr.wits.ac.za

University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK

Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, South Africa

Other related links:
'Health inequalities: the legacy of apartheid in South Africa'

'A more just society: health spending in South Africa'

'The colour of money - healthcare financing in post-apartheid South Africa'

'Insurance policy: the concept of social health insurance in South Africa'

'Health-wealth unhappiness: healthcare inequalities in South Africa'

'The equity impacts of community financing initiatives in Africa'

See id21's collection of links relevant to health systems and economics.

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 6th October 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21

 

 

Go to the University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa site.

 

 

Go to the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, UK site.

 

 

Go to the Health Economics Unit, University of Cape Town, South Africa site.