Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Health
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Health
  Health systems
and economics
  Non-communicable
diseases
  Infectious
diseases
  HIV/AIDS
  Sexual and
reproductive health
  Maternal health
  Child health
  Environmental
health
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Ability to pay: the effects of charging people for health care in Tajikistan

Most countries in the Former Soviet Union either have plans to reform or have already begun to reform their health system.  With people’s incomes and tax revenues falling, governments need to find new ways of financing health care.  Introducing health care treatment charges in an effort to balance the budget may mean that less people receive the treatment they need. Policy in this area should be closely linked to the individual's ability to pay.

At independence in 1991, Tajikistan was the poorest of all the Soviet Republics.  However, part of the Soviet legacy was almost universal literacy and a life expectancy of 70 years.  The health service was comprehensive and free, if inefficient. Since independence, the country has faced the economic upheaval of moving from a planned to a market economy, as well as civil war.  Spending on health care is now less than a tenth of its pre-independence level and there is little money for drugs and food, let alone maintaining or rebuilding facilities.  In 1999 over half of rural clinics did not have oral rehydration salts in stock and two-thirds were unable to monitor the growth of young children.

The UK's University of Southampton analysed the Tajikistan Living Standards Survey, a national household survey of 2 000 families carried out in May 1999, to discover how much people were currently paying for health care and whether poverty prevented people from seeking medical attention. Payments in cash or in kind are increasingly expected for consultations as doctors and nurses seek to survive on an income of less than US$ 5 per month.  These salaries, compared to the average salary of US$ 11 per month, are often paid several months in arrears. The study found that:

  • The poor use the health system much less than the top 20 % ‘wealthy’ members of society - although more than 90 % of the population is living below the official poverty line
  • The cost of consultations and treatment is preventing people from visiting the doctor for advice in the first place and, if money is found for a consultation, the patient often cannot afford the treatment recommended by the doctor
  • Although exemptions are made on an informal basis, some families have to sell their possessions or go into debt to meet the costs of care.

The report suggests that the current system of informal payments should be made official.  However, care should be taken that the system does not become more unjust than at present. Policy-makers must be aware that if doctors’ salaries do not increase, then bribes will continue side-by-side with the new payments, making health care even more expensive.

Bribes from the poor are considerably lower than those from the wealthy at present.  Official charges must be linked to people’s ability to pay, for example the young, the elderly and the chronically sick, as well as the poor, could be exempt from paying for treatment.

Source(s):
‘Poverty, out-of-pocket payments and access to health care: evidence from Tajikistan’, Social Science and Medicine 58: 247-258, by J. Falkingham, 2004
‘Inequality in utilisation of maternal health care in Tajikistan’, Studies in Family Planning 34 (1): 32-43, by J. Falkingham, 2003
'Understanding informal payments for health care: the example of Bulgaria', Health Policy 62 (3): 243-73, by D. Balabanova and M. McKee, 2002

Funded by: United Nations Development Programme (UNDP); World Bank

id21 Research Highlight: 19 July 2004

Further Information:
Jane Falkingham
Department of Social Statistics
University of Southampton
Southampton 
SO17 1BJ
UK

Tel: +44 23 8059 3846
Contact the contributor: j.c.falkington@soton.ac.uk

University of Southampton, UK

Other related links:
'How would you like to pay? Health care financing reforms and popular values in Bulgaria'

'Universal health care access: the experience of a Cambodian Health Equity Fund'

'Bearing the brunt of economic reform: health care and the Vietnamese poor'

'The price is right – assessing willingness to pay in Burkina Faso'

'Coping, just – access to care in the new Bulgarian health system'

See id21's collection of links relevant to health systems and economics.

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 30th June 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21


id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development www.dfid.gov.uk
id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies www.ids.ac.uk at the University of Sussex www.sussex.ac.uk
IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of
www.mediachannel.org

 

 

Go to the University of Southampton, UK site.