Go to the id21 home page   ID21 - communicating development research
Health
 
Search the whole id21 database
 

Help page and other search methods
    id21 Health
  Health systems
and economics
  Non-communicable
diseases
  Infectious
diseases
  HIV/AIDS
  Sexual and
reproductive health
  Maternal health
  Child health
  Environmental
health
 
    id21 Global Issues
 
    id21 Education
 
    id21 Urban Development
 
    id21 Natural Resources
 
    id21 Rural Development
 
    id21 Home page
 
    Gender and Violence in African Schools
 
    id21 Publications
 
    id21 Viewpoints
 
    About id21
 
    Links
 
    Contact id21
 
    id21News
 
    id21 Insights
 
    id21 Media
 
     
Kenyan communities fight back against malaria

Over the past two decades malaria has become a growing problem in the highlands of Western Kenya. In the Gusii highlands, malaria is now responsible for 33 percent of deaths and more than 60 percent of deaths in children under five.

Prompt and appropriate responses to malaria are critical for its effective management. Delays can lead to costly complications and even death. A swift response with appropriate treatment depends on many factors including cost of treatment and recognition of the danger signs of malaria. Many people choose, at first, to treat themselves at home with antimalarial drugs, sometimes incorrectly, leading to delays in accessing appropriate treatment.

To tackle this problem a number of malaria intervention programmes are running in Gusii. A baseline survey by Merlin, an international NGO, showed that community members were less likely to mention malaria danger signs than in areas where malaria is endemic. In response, Merlin started a programme in Gusii to help local people recognise signs of malaria and decide whether these are dangerous. The programme also focused on antimalarials and malaria prevention, such as the use of bed nets.

An evaluation of the programme reveals it was effective:

  • The proportion of people who correctly used sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP) antimalarial drugs increased from 21 percent to 91 percent.
  • The proportion of individuals using antipyretics to control fever increased from 31 percent during the baseline survey to under 48 percent. Correct use of antipyretics increased from 40 percent to 74 percent over the same period.
  • Mothers reported that 80 percent of children were examined for malaria at the local health centre, compared to only 29 percent in the baseline survey.
  • About 60 percent of the community recognised fever as a key sign of malaria (an increase from 55 percent reported during the baseline survey). However, it is important to note that in this area, there are other health conditions, such as typhoid fever, that mask the use of fever as a key sign for malaria. Gusii is unlike other areas where over-identification of fever and malaria is common.

These findings show that there is potential to enhance the capacity of communities and local health services to deal with changing malaria patterns. This can be achieved through providing customised information, which is sensitive to local conditions, to communities. By helping communities to recognise and respond to malaria, the impact of the disease can be promptly and effectively managed.

However, with malaria parasites' growing resistance to many antimalarial drugs, the Kenyan government has shifted its policy to the more effective artemisinin combination therapy (ACT). The drawback is its high cost which is likely to discourage people from accessing appropriate treatment unless it is subsidised.

Source(s):
'Health care switching behaviour of patients in a Kenyan rural community', Social Science and Medicine 54(3), pages 377-386, by Isaac K. Nyamongo, 2002
'Home case management for malaria: an ethnographic study of lay people’s classification of drugs', Tropical Medicine and International Health 4(11), pages 736-743, by Isaac K. Nyamongo, 1999
HINARI subscribers can access the full-text article here. Full document.

id21 Research Highlight: 18 July 2006

Further Information:
Isaac K. Nyamongo
Institute of African Studies
University of Nairobi
P.O. Box 30197
Nairobi
Kenya

Contact the contributor: inyamongo@uonbi.ac.ke

John Muturi
Merlin-Kisii
P.O. Box 44
Kisii
Kenya

Contact the contributor: kisii@merlin.org.uk

Other related links:
'Hitting malaria where it hurts: household and community responses in Africa'

'Buying the best? Household malaria prevention in the Gambia'

'To buy or not to buy? Communities and bed nets in rural Ghana'

'Forgotten people: malaria control in refugee camps'

'Seeking treatment for childhood fevers in Tanzania'

'Mosquito nets challenge tradition in Tanzania'

'Malaria: the acceptable disease in Tanzania'

Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Unless stated otherwise articles may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided id21 and originating author(s) and institution(s) are acknowledged.

Copyright © 2007 id21. All rights reserved.

Week beginning Monday 30th June 2008
FREE Information Delivery services from id21:
Get updates by email: id21 news
Insights: research digests
Contact id21


id21 is funded by the UK Department for International Development www.dfid.gov.uk
id21 is one of a family of knowledge services at the Institute of Development Studies www.ids.ac.uk at the University of Sussex www.sussex.ac.uk
IDS is a charitable company, No. 877338. id21 is a www.oneworld.net partner and an affiliate of
www.mediachannel.org