![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
||
|
|
Saving women's livesCalling for a giant leap in international abortion policy
While the public health impact of unsafe abortion has long been recognised, little has been done to tackle the strategic and policy barriers to saving women's lives. The World Health Assembly identified unsafe abortion as a serious public health problem as early as 1967. Later the 1994 International Conference on Population and Development (ICPD) highlighted the concept of reproductive rights and established goals and targets, including universal access to reproductive health (services) by 2015. The ICPD Programme of Action called for all parties to deal with the health impact of unsafe abortion and improve family planning services. It noted that abortion should be safe when it is legal, whilst in all cases, women should have access to quality services to manage complications from abortion. To help to avoid repeat abortion, post-abortion counselling, education and family planning services should be offered. In June-July 1999, the Special Session of the United Nations General Assembly urged health systems to train and equip health professionals to provide safe abortion and post-abortion care where legal. In 2004, the World Health Assembly approved the Reproductive Health Strategy of the World Health Organization (WHO) noting that unsafe abortion must be dealt with as part of the Millennium Development Goal on improving maternal health. In September 2006, the Special Session of the African Union Conference of Ministers of Health held in Maputo, agreed on a Plan of Action to:
Putting plans into actionUnsafe abortion is generally accepted as being an important and preventable cause of maternal death. It is agreed that safe abortion services should be provided to the full extent of the law and that post-abortion care should be provided everywhere. Expansion of access to family planning services for prevention of unsafe abortion is universally supported. However, reducing legal restrictions on access to safe abortion services remains a highly contentious issue. It is paradoxical to identify reducing maternal mortality as a priority but fail to put in place effective interventions to prevent unwanted births. Iqbal H. Shah The author alone is responsible for the views expressed in this article. The views do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the WHO. See also Universal Access to Comprehensive Sexual and Reproductive Health Services in Africa: Maputo Plan of Action for the Operationalisation of the Continental Policy Framework for Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights 2007-2010, Addis Ababa: African Union, 2006 Reproductive Health Strategy to Accelerate Progress Towards the Attainment of International Development Goals and Targets, Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Views expressed on these pages are not necessarily those of DFID, IDS, id21 or other contributing institutions. Copyright remains with the original authors but (unless stated otherwise) any article may be copied or quoted without restriction, provided both source (id21, insights) and authors are properly acknowledged and informed. Copyright © 2006 id21. All rights reserved. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||